Hello!<br><br>I would like to know the best way to put the Update() call in the following situation:<br><br><br>Let's suppose the following pipelines:<br><br>Img -> Filter1<br> |<br> v<br>Filter2<br> |<br> v<br>Filter3<br>
<br>I hope that the ASCII scheme is clear enough: An image is given to two separated pipelines. Usually, I put the Update() call to the lastest filter the pipelines (in this case I would put two separated updates at Filter1 and Filter3) However, this would make the pipelines executed sequentially.<br>
<br>However, I've thought that if I put a single Update() Call on Img instead of a Filter, maybe ITK's internal streaming/threading capabilities may be able to optimize the pipeline's execution saving memory/time.<br>
<br>Is this possible?<br><br>Regards<br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Sergio Vera<br><br> Alma IT Systems<br> C/ Vilana, 4B, 4º 1ª<br> 08022 Barcelona<br> T. (+34) 932 380 592<br> <a href="http://www.alma3d.com">www.alma3d.com</a><br>