<br>Hi Sean,<br><br>Good point, <br>Yes, the plan meant "newest GDCM".<br><br>Thanks for pointing this out.<br><br><br> Luis<br><br><br>----------------------------------------------<br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Sean McBride <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sean@rogue-research.com">sean@rogue-research.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 09:46:15 -0400, Luis Ibanez said:<br>
<br>
>Please share with us your impression on how<br>
>the current transition plan may impact your use<br>
>of ITK.<br>
<br>
</div>Since you asked... :) The plan looks nice to me. I especially like:<br>
- ditching CVS<br>
- updating to GDCM2<br>
<br>
The Wiki says "Update GDCM 1.2 to GDCM 2.0", but I assume you mean<br>
2.newest and not 2.0 exactly?<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
____________________________________________________________<br>
Sean McBride, B. Eng <a href="mailto:sean@rogue-research.com">sean@rogue-research.com</a><br>
Rogue Research <a href="http://www.rogue-research.com" target="_blank">www.rogue-research.com</a><br>
Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada<br>
<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>