Hi Xiaoxiao,<br>
Thank for pointing out these mistakes. It's weired that i didn't find the mistakes in the previous tests. There are two mistakes in the
code. I made some patches for it. However due to the network
constraint, i could not conduct tests on my laptop. Could you please
help me push them to <a href="http://review.source.kitware.com/#change,3457" target="_blank">http://review.source.kitware.com/#change,3457</a><br>
<br>
<br>
thanks and regards<br>
<br>
<br>
wanlin<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Xiaoxiao Liu <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:xiaoxiao.liu@kitware.com">xiaoxiao.liu@kitware.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>Hi Wanlin, </div><div>Will you please take a look at this win64 error?: </div><div><a href="http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=123324636&build=1794079" target="_blank">http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=123324636&build=1794079</a></div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>The baseline mesh file has : </div><div>1 8 6 24</div><div> 1 6</div><div> 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00</div><div> 1.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00</div>
<div> 1.00000E+00 2.00000E+00 0.00000E+00</div><div> 0.00000E+00 2.00000E+00 0.00000E+00</div><div> 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 1.00000E+00</div><div> 1.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 1.00000E+00</div><div> 1.00000E+00 2.00000E+00 1.00000E+00</div>
<div> 0.00000E+00 2.00000E+00 1.00000E+00</div><div> 4 3 2 -1</div><div> 5 6 7 -8</div><div> 1 5 8 -4</div><div> 4 8 7 -3</div><div>
3 7 6 -2</div><div> 2 6 5 -1</div><div><br></div><div>and the output file from the win64 machine is : </div><div> 1 8 6 12</div><div> 1 6</div>
<div> 0.000000e+000 0.000000e+000 0.000000e+000</div><div> 1.000000e+000 0.000000e+000 0.000000e+000</div><div> 1.000000e+000 2.000000e+000 0.000000e+000</div><div> 0.000000e+000 2.000000e+000 0.000000e+000</div><div> 0.000000e+000 0.000000e+000 1.000000e+000</div>
<div> 1.000000e+000 0.000000e+000 1.000000e+000</div><div> 1.000000e+000 2.000000e+000 1.000000e+000</div><div> 0.000000e+000 2.000000e+000 1.000000e+000</div><div> 4 3 2 18446744073709551</div><div>
615</div><div> 5 6 7 18446744073709551</div><div>608</div><div> 1 5 8 18446744073709551</div><div>612</div><div> 4 8 7 18446744073709551</div><div>613</div>
<div> 3 7 6 18446744073709551</div><div>614</div><div> 2 6 5 18446744073709551</div><div>615</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>There is something wrong with the four column data. When you sign -1 to a unsigned long number, you will get this large number on win64.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Also there are some integer type inconsistencies looks fishy:</div><div> <a href="http://review.source.kitware.com/#change,3457" target="_blank">http://review.source.kitware.com/#change,3457</a></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>Thanks!<div>-Xiaoxiao<br><div><br></div>---------------------------------------------<br><b>Xiaoxiao Liu</b>, Ph.D.<div>
<div><div><font face="arial, sans-serif"><span style="border-collapse: collapse;">R & D Engineer</span></font></div>
<div><div><a href="http://www.kitware.com/" target="_blank">Kitware Inc</a>.</div></div><div><span style="border-collapse: collapse; font-family: arial,sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Clifton Park, NY</span><div><div>Phone: <a href="tel:%28518%29%20881-4924" value="+15188814924" target="_blank">(518) 881-4924</a> or <span style="border-collapse: collapse; color: rgb(136, 136, 136); font-family: arial,sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><a href="tel:%28518%29%20371-3971%20x124" value="+15183713971" target="_blank">(518) 371-3971 x124</a></span></div>
<div><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span style="line-height: 31px; font-size: x-small;"><br></span></font></div></div></div></div></div><br>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br>