<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Hi,<br></div>Thanks for the quick reply. <br></div>Reading the documentation on the MultiScaleHessian, "The Hessian-based measure is computed from the Hessian image at each scale level and the best response is selected." Does this mean that the final image produced is the result at only one scale producing the best response or a mixture of the results at different scales and each pixel is takes the value from the hessian image giving the best response?<br>
<br></div>Thank you<br>Jesse<br><div> <br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Kevin H. Hobbs <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hobbsk@ohio.edu" target="_blank">hobbsk@ohio.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On 08/22/2013 09:23 AM, Jesse Ross-Jones wrote:<br>
><br>
> I found however that the larger vessels were left hollow. In order to<br>
> fill in the larger vessels I ran the same filter again with a larger<br>
> sigma and then sum the results at the two scales. I am wondering if this<br>
> is a recommended way to fill in the vessels?<br>
<br>
</div>There was a discussion of multi-scale vesselness in the IJ paper about<br>
vessel enhansing diffusion :<br>
<br>
<a href="http://hdl.handle.net/1926/558" target="_blank">http://hdl.handle.net/1926/558</a><br>
<br>
As I recall they took the scale with the largest vesselness.<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>