TubeTK/Events/2010.07.26: Difference between revisions
From KitwarePublic
Jump to navigationJump to search
Jamie.snape (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
* Primary goal: ultrasound image processing | * Primary goal: ultrasound image processing | ||
* Accomplished | * Accomplished | ||
** Correct a bug in itkAnisotropicHybridDiffusionImageFilter | ** Correct a bug in itkAnisotropicHybridDiffusionImageFilter | ||
** prepared figures for Andinet's Insight Journal paper. | |||
** Improve code coverage for uncovered filters under Application/CLI/** Increase coverage of TubeTK | ** Improve code coverage for uncovered filters under Application/CLI/** Increase coverage of TubeTK | ||
* Near term (August 2) | * Near term (August 2) | ||
Line 110: | Line 111: | ||
**** http://www.insight-journal.org/midas/item/view/117 | **** http://www.insight-journal.org/midas/item/view/117 | ||
* Medium term (August 9) | * Medium term (August 9) | ||
[[Category:TubeTK Events and Meetings|2010.07.26]] |
Latest revision as of 18:45, 26 July 2013
Topics
- Dashboards auto update?
- tubetk/CMake/DashboardScripts tubetk/CMake/CTestCustom...
- Batch Processing
- Python vs BatchMake vs Any
- Slicer
- TubeNet Viewer
- Slicer load .tre
- Slicer Loadable Module
- Registration
- Speckle in ultrasound registration
- Model-based deformation field interpolation
- Fluid deformation (Marc)
- Registration metrics based on ultrasound probe orientation
- Segmentation
- Unit test VTree code
- 3D
- 2D
- Automated vessel tree extraction
- Using spatial prior
- Seed selection
- Automated distinguishing arteries from veins based on spatial prior
- Unit test VTree code
- Atlas formation
- Retinal data
- Email from UIowa (still waiting)
- Brain data
- Vessel extractions from Liz
- Port pipeline to VTree
- Retinal data
Status
Patrick
- Primary goal: Bump and dent identification on IC images
- Accomplishments
- Traveled to SSRL to view the acquisition and meet with Greg and Mike.
- Modified the GenerateFeatures application to handle the input of arbitrary feature images
- Using the previous features and Casey's new patch-based features, was able to achieve 95% pixel level accuracy in Weka and 23/25 defects found with 0 false positives in image space (after morphology).
- Explore new features
- evaluate a variety of standard deviations for intensity and ridge computations
- Near Term (Aug 2)
- Receiving code to simulate the tomography directly on GDS Layers
- Compute dot-product between line (hessian) tangent and normal directions in ES and GDS images
- Subselect features
- Product: ~ 5 slides / report to USC illustrating path chosen, strengths, and weaknesses.
- Real-world tests / workflow
- Does a trained classifier work on other layers?
- Does a trained classifier work on other acquisitions?
- i.e., do we need to insert modifications for training on every slice / acquisition / ?
- Normalizing for inter-acquisition (or inter-slice) variations?
- Work with new collaborator at Kitware.
- Medium term (August 9)
- Delivery and education
- Can we get better in simulation?
- chip-to-chip matching
- connectivity analysis
Casey
- Primary goal: Compare populations of vascular networks
- Near term (Aug 2)
- Feature extraction
- Patch-based features (max, median, quantiles)
- Scales / neighborhood
- Feature research
- Width estimate
- Not the same as Gaussian blur
- New patch features
- Location of local max in ridgeness
- Subsample centerlines
- Optimal match filter
- Width estimate
- Classifiers
- Comparison
- Implementation for transfer to USC
- Hierarchy (Good/bad. If bad, then add/sub.)
- Feature extraction
- Medium term (Aug 9)
- Connectivity analysis
- chip-to-chip comparison
Andinet
- Primary goal: Data from Duke for BWH
- Accomplishments
- Data from Duke
- Contacted several folks to gather information ( we had questions regarding the machine at Duke) and check status.
- BrainLab: Contacted Pratik. He is working on getting us VV license
- Duke: Contacted Tanya and learned that SD-5000 ultrasound machine is not integrated with the BrainLab system. The machine is used to acquire ultrasound data independently.
- Aloka: Contacted John Walsh at Aloka and learned that SD-5000 is very old model and doesn't come with research interface
- Based upon the conversation I had with you, may be we should probably look into saving data off the BrainLab system itself not bother with the SD-5000.
- Contacted several folks to gather information ( we had questions regarding the machine at Duke) and check status.
- Write IJ article
- Made progress writing the IJ article. Hua helped me a lot generating results using synthetic data. We have now a solid outline and some write up in most of the sections
- You can also access the tex, bib, etc files in my Work directory: Work/Andinet/TensorIJ
- Data from Duke
- Near term (August 2)
- IJ Article
- Move article to TubeTK/Documentation/2010.TensorIJ
- Add more texts, figures and results and clean it up more.
- Put together self-contained source code tree containing the classes that we will submit with this paper.
- Refer to TubeTK
- Cite grant proposal in article
- Install VV at Duke
- IJ Article
- Medium term (August 9)
Hua
- Primary goal: ultrasound image processing
- Accomplished
- Correct a bug in itkAnisotropicHybridDiffusionImageFilter
- prepared figures for Andinet's Insight Journal paper.
- Improve code coverage for uncovered filters under Application/CLI/** Increase coverage of TubeTK
- Near term (August 2)
- Update registration code
- Begin investigation of registration metrics that depend on ultrasound probe orientation
- Get data from InnerOptic
- Medium term (August 9)