TubeTK/Events/2010.11.02: Difference between revisions
From KitwarePublic
Jump to navigationJump to search
Jamie.snape (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Jamie.snape (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
* To think about: MICCAI 2011 (submission of full papers = March 11) | * To think about: MICCAI 2011 (submission of full papers = March 11) | ||
[[Category:TubeTK]] | [[Category:TubeTK Events and Meetings|2010.11.02]] | ||
Latest revision as of 18:49, 26 July 2013
Romain
- Implementation on the ComputeTortuosity module (only Distance Metric) ---->OK!!
- With input data = Branch-truth.tre (from tubetk/Data)
- With mask covering the whole tube (Branch.n010.mha):
- Distance Metric Tortuosity for tube section 0 - 999 is 0.0524638
- Distance Metric Tortuosity for tube section 0 - 499 is 0.0656099
- With other mask (Branch.n010.sub.mha) not covering the whole scene
- Distance Metric Tortuosity for tube section 0 - 399 is 0.0811677
- With mask covering the whole tube (Branch.n010.mha):
- With input data = Branch-truth.tre (from tubetk/Data)
- Future
- tortuosity: documentation, tests, checkin
- Grassroots data visualization
- Conference website
- CLANG errors in metaImage
- GRASSROOT
- re-sample
Stephen
- TubeSpatialObject
- Bug in ComputeTangentAndNormals
- Therefore, Tube/Base/Segmentation/VTree/tubeMath.h
- Pursue refactoring of itk's SpatialObject classes
- Time? Funding?
- RadiusEstimation
- Refactoring complete, bugs remain, tests being added
- Slicer integration
- Next Priority
- USC
- Funding becoming active
- Urgent need for unsupervised method
- Grassroots
- Received data
- Romain to view in Slicer and send visualization to Danielle and Stephen
- NDA signed
- Meeting next week
- UCLA/TBI
- Received data (can't find it)
- Visualizations needed (Danielle)
- BWH US Machine in Eternia
Danielle
- Successfully registered XCAT images:
- Anisotropic gives much better motion field
- Gaussian does a bit of a better job than anisotropic
- Currently doing last validations = mutual overlap / Haussdorf distance between surfaces (with Valmet)
- Small questions:
- Max filename size in ITK?
- Valmet only in Windows...
- Next priorities: TubeTK dashboard, some code cleanup, register CT data, then implement improvements from Marc's suggestions + discussion with Stephen on Friday (coarse to fine, normals as matrices to handle corners)
- To think about: MICCAI 2011 (submission of full papers = March 11)
