TubeTK/Events/2010.07.12: Difference between revisions
From KitwarePublic
Jump to navigationJump to search
Jamie.snape (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Jamie.snape (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
** Simulating ultrasound from MR/CT | ** Simulating ultrasound from MR/CT | ||
[[Category:TubeTK]] | [[Category:TubeTK Events and Meetings|2010.07.12]] |
Latest revision as of 18:45, 26 July 2013
Andinet
- Primary goal: Data from Duke for BWH
- Accomplishments
- Attend NAMIC AHM
- Determine what is necessary to record data sent to OpenIGTLink from VectorVision system
- Define data workflow and software architecture
- Begin implementation
- Product: powerpoint presentation: 5 slides
- Near term (August 1)
- Install VV at Duke
- Determine if we can get US data from Duke machine
- Write IJ article
- Cite grant proposal in article
- Medium term (1.5 months, August 15)
- Investigate simulation of ultrasound from MR/CT (Talk to Stephen First :) )
- Code review of vessel segmentation method from Stephen
Patrick
- Primary goal: Bump and dent identification on IC images
- Accomplishments
- Explore new features
- z-score values from three different mean/stdDev joint histograms: add, subtract, and unchanged
- evaluate a variety of standard deviations for intensity and ridge computations
- New centerline method (skeletonization)
- GenerateFeaturesForWeka
- Explore new features
- Near Term (Aug 1)
- Get registered data from Greg
- compute dot-product between line (hessian) tangent and normal directions in ES and GDS images
- write program that goes from Weka output to image and computes TPR/FPR scores on that image
- Collaborate with Casey
- Choose classification scheme
- Implement in C++ or python - in tubetk
- Use neuralnets / parzenWindowing in ITK
- Subselect features
- Product: ~ 5 slides / report to USC illustrating path chosen, strengths, and weaknesses.
- Real-world tests / workflow
- Does a trained classifier work on other layers?
- Does a trained classifier work on other acquisitions?
- i.e., do we need to insert modifications for training on every slice / acquisition / ?
- Normalizing for inter-acquisition (or inter-slice) variations?
- Go to Synchrotron
- Medium term (1 months, August 15)
- Delivery and education
- Can we get better in simulation?
- Connectivity analysis
Casey
- Primary goal: Compare populations of vascular networks
- Near term (0.5, Aug 1)
- Collaborate with Patrick
- Feature extraction
- Patch-based features (max, median, quantiles)
- Scales / neighborhood
- Feature research
- Width estimate from Stephen (concern, time)
- Location of local max in ridgeness
- Subsample centerlines
- Optimal match filter
- Classifiers
- Comparison
- Implementation for transfer to USC
- Hierarchy (Good/bad. If bad, then add/sub.)
- Feature extraction
- Data for Retinas
- Collaborate with Patrick
- Medium term (1 months, Aug 15)
- Review previous processing pipeline with Stephen
- Research on methods for comparing spatial graphs / adjacency matrices
- Begin Port and test existing adjacency code
- Process retinal data
- Complete port and test of existing adjacency code
- Prepare IJ article
Hua
- Primary goal: ultrasound image processing
- Accomplished
- Verify Andinet's code: add tests and help with IJ publication
- Creating tests (sin pattern with known derivatives)
- Verify Andinet's code: add tests and help with IJ publication
- Near term (August 1)
- Increase coverage of TubeTK
- Update registration code
- Begin investigation of registration metrics that depend on ultrasound probe orientation
- Get data from InnerOptic
- Design phantom or use something from InnerOptic
- Discuss with InnerOptic
- CIRS Phantom
- http://www.insight-journal.org/midas/item/view/2206
- http://www.insight-journal.org/midas/item/view/117
- Get data from InnerOptic
- Medium term (1.5 months
- Investigate use of speckle in ultrasound registration
- Model-based deformation field interpolation
- 2D-3D registration (data)
- Simulating ultrasound from MR/CT