SimpleITK

Simple ITK

Goals

• Provide an easy-access layer to ITK for non-C++ expert developers

Sandbox

• http://github.com/dblezek/SimpleITK

Scope

Suggested Areas to Cover

• IO
• Basic Filters
• Registration
  • Basic Framework
  • Deformable registration
    • BSplines
    • Demons
• Segmentation
  • Region Growing
  • Level Sets
  • Classifiers

Types

• Image pixel types supported
  • int8_t
  • int16_t
  • int32_t
  • float
• Image dimensions supported
  • 3D
  • Is 2D managed as a 3D image of 1 slice ?
    • Performance penalty for neighborhood filters... ?
    • Could be "2D" versions of 3D filters, i.e. RecursiveGaussianFilter2D. This would work on a slice-by-slice basis.

Languages

Wrapped languages will be any that SWIG supports, if someone is willing to write tests / any needed glue code.

• C++ Layer
• Python
• Lua
• Java
• ?

Implementation Details

• Coding Style
  • Copyright Headers & License
• Const correctness (can we avoid using const's completely?)
• Testing
  • C++ testing (Google Test?)
  • Python tests (PyUnit?)
  • Lua tests (?!?)
  • Java tests (JUnit)
  • ? other languages ?
• Managing basic types
  • Arrays
  • Regions
  • Transforms
• Not so basic types (could these be enums passed as ivars?)
  • Interpolators
  • Optimizers
  • Metrics

Plan

• Image classes
• IO

TCons

Tcon topics 7/15/2010

Toll-Free #:      1-800-704-9804 
International #:  1-404-920-6604
Participant Code: 61466276

Thursday, July 15th, 3:30-5:00pm EDT
(2:30-4:00pm Central).

• General architecture
• Wrapping efficiency
• Should SimpleITK be mixable with normal ITK ?
  • At C++ level ?
  • At WrapITK (Python, Tcl ) level ?
  • Provide access to the underlying ITK image ?
• SimpleImage class
  • Include casting to other image types.
  • Introduce in ITK an itk::ImageBase class that is not templated over Dimension.
• Use Pointer semantics ?
  • image->getDepth() vs image.getDepth()

• What kind of flexibility to provide for Users to add functionalities to SimpleITK
  • It should be easy to write (even if the class is conceptually complex).
  • User says : "I need this data type X..."
    • Then, how hard is for the developer of SimpleITK classes to satisfy the user's request.

• Design a Simple calling convention
  • Procedural-like notation...
  • out = Gaussian().setSigma(2).execute(image)
  • out = Gaussian( image, 2 )
  • Gaussian gaussian( 2 ) // sigma as argument to the constructor
  • gaussian( "Sigma",2, "Width", 2 ); // arguments packed as key,value pair
  • Add introspection to ITK proper
    • All filters provide a list of "Key, Type" pairs
    • SetParameter( "parameterName", parameterValue );

Tcon topics 7/16/2010

• IO class to combine ImageFileReader and ImageSeriesReader into a single class.
• Namespace to use : "sitk" or "stk".
• Const-correctness: (yes)
• Thread-safety:
  • The same instance of the object can't be used from multiple-threads.
  • Multiple-threads can create instances of an object type.
• Testing
  • Based on the same testing framework as ITK.
  • Higher quality bar than ITK proper.

Tcon topics 7/22/2010

• Should SimpleITK be mixable with VTK?
  • SimpleImage class include casting to vtkImage?
  • Concept: interactive programming languages are really cool if they include data visualization. We need to have a way to visualize images as we process them.