Minutes 040607: Difference between revisions
From KitwarePublic
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
*** Maybe should derive from Sample ? | *** Maybe should derive from Sample ? | ||
*** Identify Use cases before deciding. | *** Identify Use cases before deciding. | ||
*** Allow other distance (non-Euclidean) to be used. | |||
** Classifiers | |||
*** Do not quite fit in a pipeline style... | |||
*** We need to study Use Cases. | |||
*** Some in Statistics / Some in Algorithms (for Images). | |||
== Action Items == | == Action Items == | ||
Revision as of 17:48, 6 April 2007
Attendees
- Jim Miller
- Nick Tuicston
- Luis Ibanez
Discussion
- Statistics
- Jim suggests to add a cross-sample
- Agree to
- Sample derive from DataObject
- SampleAlgorithmBase derive from DataObject
- Generators
- Only the ones that do not need inputs
- That comes down to the random number generators
- Deprecation Strategy
- Keep the old classes, delegating to the new classes?
- Better for maintenance.
- Keep the old classes around, with a CMake configuration option?
- Brings the complication of requiring duplicate dashboard to ensure that both versions of the code still work.
- ListSampleBase
- Candidate for deprecation
- Search algorithm
- Distances
- Have them as plug in objects or as Functor
- KdTree
- Maybe not to derive from DataObject ?
- Maybe should derive from Sample ?
- Identify Use cases before deciding.
- Allow other distance (non-Euclidean) to be used.
- Classifiers
- Do not quite fit in a pipeline style...
- We need to study Use Cases.
- Some in Statistics / Some in Algorithms (for Images).
- Keep the old classes, delegating to the new classes?
