Difference between revisions of "Proposed Changes to VTK"

From KitwarePublic
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Suggestion for changing the way we use Doxygen to document our API.)
(vtk user voice now exists, remove it from the TODO list)
Line 1: Line 1:
The following are proposed, broad changes to VTK as suggested by users and developers. These changes are posted here for approval by the VTK ARB (Architecture Review Board). Please review and provide feedback on the VTK Developers mailing list.
The following are proposed, broad changes to VTK as suggested by users and developers. These changes are posted here for approval by the VTK ARB (Architecture Review Board). Please review and provide feedback on the VTK Developers mailing list.
* Adding [http://www.uservoice.com UserVoice] to VTK similar to ParaView.


* [[VTK Shaders | VTK Shaders]]
* [[VTK Shaders | VTK Shaders]]

Revision as of 16:12, 15 December 2009

The following are proposed, broad changes to VTK as suggested by users and developers. These changes are posted here for approval by the VTK ARB (Architecture Review Board). Please review and provide feedback on the VTK Developers mailing list.

  • Email the VTK developer's mailing list when a new bug report is added.
  • Run VTK/Utilities/Doxygen/doc_header2doxygen.pl on the headers, commit the result and use Doxygen directly in the future - allowing the developers to group etc according to documentation guidelines. This would also allow new developers to read Doxygen tutorials and use standard Doxygen comments in headers - lowering the barrier to entry.



VTK: [Welcome | Site Map]