Talk:CMake:How To Find Libraries: Difference between revisions
From KitwarePublic
Jump to navigationJump to search
(courtesy) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
But, on a rather sentimental issue, I was shocked to see the following comment once I downloaded the file: | But, on a rather sentimental issue, I was shocked to see the following comment once I downloaded the file: | ||
<pre> | |||
# ... | # ... | ||
| Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
# where they added pkg_check_modules ... | # where they added pkg_check_modules ... | ||
# | # | ||
</pre> | |||
One can understand you anger, and mail groups are a good place to discuss these (I am sure you already have). But can we please remove such remarks from the distributed code? | One can understand you anger, and mail groups are a good place to discuss these (I am sure you already have). But can we please remove such remarks from the distributed code? | ||
| Line 13: | Line 15: | ||
thanks for the module. | thanks for the module. | ||
sly | --[[User:Sly|sly]] 13:36, 1 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:36, 1 May 2009
Nice tutorial on "How to write Find modules", and I haven't had the chance to use it but LibFindMacros.cmake seems to be a nice utility.
But, on a rather sentimental issue, I was shocked to see the following comment once I downloaded the file:
# ... # Damn CMake developers made the UsePkgConfig system deprecated in the same release (2.6) # where they added pkg_check_modules ... #
One can understand you anger, and mail groups are a good place to discuss these (I am sure you already have). But can we please remove such remarks from the distributed code?
thanks for the module.
--sly 13:36, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
