[ITK] Query about building ITK on Windows 64-bit with Python Wrapping
Evan Kao
tossin at gmail.com
Sun Apr 5 04:56:30 EDT 2015
Hello Matt,
I'm using Python 2.7.6. I'll see whether I have better luck with a
different build later.
Thanks,
Evan Kao
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Matt McCormick <matt.mccormick at kitware.com>
wrote:
> Hi Evan,
>
> Thanks for your persistance and sharing your experiences with the list!
>
> To answer a previous question, it should not take so long to build the
> wrapping. Using the Ninja generator, wrapping is built on the
> dashboard in under 2 hours, including all the tests. To speed things
> up, try disabling BUILD_TESTING and BUILD_EXAMPLES. Also parallelize
> your build as described here [1].
>
> What version of Python are you using?
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
> [1] http://www.kitware.com/blog/home/post/434
>
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 4:19 AM, Evan Kao <tossin at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi itk-users,
> >
> > I'm still having a lot of trouble importing ITK into Python. If I add
> the
> > following paths (specified in WrapITK.pth) to PYTHONPATH:
> >
> > ..\lib\Release
> > ..\Wrapping\Generators\Python\Release
> >
> > and ..\bin\Release to PATH, then attempt to import itk, I get the
> following
> > error:
> >
> >> Traceback (most recent call last):
> >> File "<console>", line 2, in <module>
> >> File "L:\git\ITK-build\Wrapping\Generators\Python\Release\itk.py",
> line
> >> 54, in <module>
> >> itkBase.LoadModule(module, thisModule.__dict__)
> >> File "L:\git\ITK-build\Wrapping\Generators\Python\Release\itkBase.py",
> >> line 53, in LoadModule
> >> swig.__dict__.update(this_module.swig.__dict__)
> >> AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'swig'
> >
> >
> > If in itkConfig.py I set LazyLoading = False, and attempt to import itk,
> I
> > get:
> >
> >> Traceback (most recent call last):
> >> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
> >> File "L:\git\ITK-build\Wrapping\Generators\Python\Release\itk.py",
> line
> >> 54, in <module>
> >> itkBase.LoadModule(module, thisModule.__dict__)
> >> File "L:\git\ITK-build\Wrapping\Generators\Python\Release\itkBase.py",
> >> line 108, in LoadModule
> >> LoadModule(dep, namespace)
> >> File "L:\git\ITK-build\Wrapping\Generators\Python\Release\itkBase.py",
> >> line 108, in LoadModule
> >> LoadModule(dep, namespace)
> >> File "L:\git\ITK-build\Wrapping\Generators\Python\Release\itkBase.py",
> >> line 108, in LoadModule
> >> LoadModule(dep, namespace)
> >> File "L:\git\ITK-build\Wrapping\Generators\Python\Release\itkBase.py",
> >> line 108, in LoadModule
> >> LoadModule(dep, namespace)
> >> File "L:\git\ITK-build\Wrapping\Generators\Python\Release\itkBase.py",
> >> line 118, in LoadModule
> >> module = loader.load(swigModuleName)
> >> File "L:\git\ITK-build\Wrapping\Generators\Python\Release\itkBase.py",
> >> line 225, in load
> >> fp, pathname, description = imp.find_module(name)
> >> ImportError: No module named ITKPyBasePython
> >
> >
> > So it seems like it can't find the python modules. So I tried adding
> ..\lib
> > to the PYTHONPATH and then imported itk and no errors appeared. However
> if
> > I try instantiating a class, I get:
> >
> >> Traceback (most recent call last):
> >> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
> >> TypeError: 'itkTemplate' object is not callable
> >
> >
> > Anybody have any ideas on what's going on? Or suggestions on how to
> > proceed?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Evan Kao
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Evan Kao <tossin at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello Bradley,
> >>
> >> Regarding registration, I'm just exploring options right now. It seems
> >> like SimpleITK 0.9b is the way to go then.
> >>
> >> I still attempted to build ITK 4.8 with python-wrapping on and a few
> >> additional optional modules that I turned on mainly because they sounded
> >> interesting (ITKConfig.cmake attached for reference) with Visual Studio
> >> 2013/ver 12. The build took about 12 hours (is that normal?) and seems
> to
> >> have mostly succeeded other than a few errors in the optional modules (I
> >> think they were in BridgeNumpy and VariationalRegistration).
> >>
> >> However I'm having some trouble using itk in python (same as the one
> >> described here). I've tried adding the WrapITK.pth file to
> site-packages as
> >> well as directly adding both of the paths specified in WrapITK.pth
> directly
> >> to the PYTHONPATH, but keep getting "AttributeError: 'module' object
> has no
> >> attribute 'swig' " every time I attempt to use a filter. Do you know
> how to
> >> fix the issue?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Evan Kao
> >>
> >> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Bradley Lowekamp <
> blowekamp at mail.nih.gov>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> WrapITK has recently been upgraded to use CastXML ( clang based ),
> >>> instead of GCCXML. This appears to now be working MS VS12 ( aka Visual
> >>> Studio 2013?) windows compiler[1]. This is relatively new and it would
> be
> >>> great if you can checkout ITK master and try to build it and report
> how it
> >>> works for you. The wiki hasn't been updated with this latest bit of
> >>> information.
> >>>
> >>> However please keep in mind that WrapITK does not contain 100% of ITK
> and
> >>> not 100% of Registration. For example it does contain the ITKv3
> >>> ImageRegistationMethod however it doest not contain the new ITKv4
> >>> ImageRegistration method or frame work. With effort this thing can be
> >>> wrapped.
> >>>
> >>> If you have to resort to SimpleITK, you will find the binaries for
> >>> window64 readily available from the nightly dashboard[2]. The best
> place to
> >>> check if SimpleITK has the registration methods you need would be the
> >>> doxygen[3]. It contains the ITKv4 Registration framework, as well as
> some
> >>> legacy image registration filter. The frame work is capable of affines,
> >>> bspline, and displacement transforms and many nice feature of the ITKv4
> >>> framework.
> >>>
> >>> Do you have a specific registration method you are looking to do? or
> just
> >>> explore some options?
> >>>
> >>> Brad
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://open.cdash.org/buildSummary.php?buildid=3738598
> >>> [2] http://www.itk.org/Wiki/SimpleITK/GettingStarted#Nightly_binaries
> >>> [3] http://www.itk.org/SimpleITKDoxygen/html/classes.html
> >>>
> >>> On Mar 21, 2015, at 3:17 AM, Evan Kao <tossin at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello itk-users,
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to use ITK features in python that don't seem to be
> implemented
> >>> in the latest stable release of SimpleITK, like image registration and
> >>> quadmesh filters. However, looking around the internet, several
> sources
> >>> (like the Wiki, this thread from about 5 months ago, or this site)
> seem to
> >>> suggest building WrapITK isn't possible on a 64-bit machine due to
> conflict
> >>> between GCCXML and any Visual Studio beyond 2008 (and VS2008 64-bit
> >>> apparently only comes with the professional edition, which I'm not
> even sure
> >>> is available or worth obtaining). The Wiki also suggests mingw64 is
> also
> >>> not viable. Is this still the case? Is there anyway to use ITK with
> >>> python on a 64-bit machine?
> >>>
> >>> If I have to resort to the latest nightly binary of SimpleITK for image
> >>> registration, does it include all the registration methods available
> in ITK?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Evan Kao
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Community mailing list
> >>> Community at itk.org
> >>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/community
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Community mailing list
> > Community at itk.org
> > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/community
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/community/attachments/20150405/6e151802/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Community
mailing list