[IGSTK-Developers] meeting tomorrow

[Patrick Cheng]

Hi Noby,

I will add this to the meeting agenda on this Thursday (1pm EST).
I will send out the agenda later today.

Thank you,

Patrick

Nobuhiko Hata wrote:
> Hello
> 
> In the meeting tomorrow, I have a set of specific questions I would like 
> to discuss with the core developers of IGSTK.
> Let me know if you have time to discuss this (-> Kevin)
> 
> 1) Possibility of putting IGSTK first in build tree of Slicer 3. See or 
> Try  http://wiki.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/Slicer3:Build_Instructions. 
> Ease of separing FLTK.
> 2) Difference/similarity of state machine mechanism implemented in 
> EMSegmentor of Slicer 3, and IGSTK. If it is similar, it is good.
> 3) Tracker library. Specifically weakness/strength against opentracker 
> library.
> 4) How we can commit our registration algorithm, for instance unscented 
> Kalman filter-based point-to-point registration (fine tuning after ICP).
> 
> I am asking this question with an interest to shift our focus from SIGN 
> (www.ncigt.org) to Slicer+IGSTK in Brigham.
> Looking forward to discussing with all of you.
> 
> 
> -------------------
> Nobuhiko Hata, Ph.D.
> National Center for Image Guided Therapy
> Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital
> Harvard Medical School
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IGSTK-Developers mailing list
> IGSTK-Developers at public.kitware.com
> http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/igstk-developers
> 
> 
>