[Insight-developers] run memtest in multithreaded ?
Karthik Krishnan
Karthik.Krishnan at kitware.com
Fri Oct 7 10:31:12 EDT 2005
What is happening is:
Your updates correspond to "Day n" and the submission is dropped off
onto the public server here on "Day n+1".
Your build and submission was dropped off just fine and wouldn't appear
on the dashboard cause its timestamps were screwed up.
There are 3 options here:
1. ctest has the option of using
--tomorrow-tag (Nightly or experimental starts with next day tag. This
is useful if the build will not finish in one day.)
While this is a nice feature, it will surely confuse people who rate
stability of the system by looking at the nightly dashboard.
2. Choose a more appropriate time for the builds.
[ 0100 (GMT) is the nightly start time.]
Yeah I know valgrind builds are painfully slow
3. What you could do is run the test in parts and ensure that several if
not all submissions will go through..
SET (CTEST_COMMAND
"/usr/local/bin/ctest -D NightlyStart -D NightlyUpdate -D NightlyConfigure -D NightlyBuild -D NightlyTest -D NightlySubmit"
"/usr/local/bin/ctest -D NightlyMemCheck -D NightlySubmit -I 0,,4"
"/usr/local/bin/ctest -D NightlyMemCheck -D NightlySubmit -I 1,,4"
"/usr/local/bin/ctest -D NightlyMemCheck -D NightlySubmit -I 2,,4"
"/usr/local/bin/ctest -D NightlyMemCheck -D NightlySubmit -I 3,,4"
)
HTH
-karthik
(Each 'Day n' is a 24 hr period)
Gaetan Lehmann wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I now run tests every days for a week, but the results are not in the
> ITK dash board. Can you help me to find what is wrong ?
> The cmake files are attached.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gaetan
>
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:39:40 +0200, Karthik Krishnan
> <Karthik.Krishnan at kitware.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Increase the DART_TESTING_TIMEOUT variable, while configuring using
>> cmake.. the default is 1500 s, before dart kills the test.
>>
>>
>> Gaetan Lehmann wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have splitted the tests in to parts. It now runs in about 16h.
>>> There is no memory problem while running 2 valgrinds at the same
>>> time, but there is some timeouts:
>>>
>>> 82 - itkGoodnessOfFitMixtureModelCostFunctionTest (Timeout)
>>> 244 - itkLevelSetFunctionTest (Timeout)
>>> 378 - itkContourMeanDistanceImageFilterTest (Timeout)
>>> 526 - itkAdaptiveHistogramEqualizationImageFilterTest (Timeout)
>>> 528 - itkAdaptiveHistogramEqualizationImageFilterTest2
>>> (Timeout)
>>> 588 - itkCannySegmentationLevelSetImageFilterTest (Timeout)
>>> 592 - itkDemonsRegistrationFilterTest (Timeout)
>>> 606 -
>>> itkGeodesicActiveContourShapePriorLevelSetImageFilterTest_2 (Timeout)
>>> 630 - itkImageRegistrationMethodTest_16 (Timeout)
>>> 636 -
>>> itkKullbackLeiblerCompareHistogramImageToImageMetricTest (Timeout)
>>> 640 - itkMattesMutualInformationImageToImageMetricTest
>>> (Timeout)
>>> 974 - ImageRegistration2Test (Timeout)
>>> 978 - ImageRegistration5Test2 (Timeout)
>>> 980 - ImageRegistration7Test (Timeout)
>>> 984 - ImageRegistration14Test (Timeout)
>>> 990 - DeformableRegistration2Test (Timeout)
>>> 992 - DeformableRegistration4Test (Timeout)
>>> 994 - DeformableRegistration6Test (Timeout)
>>> 1024 - GeodesicActiveContourShapePriorCallosumTest (Timeout)
>>>
>>> 87 - itkImageToHistogramGeneratorTest (Timeout)
>>> 103 - itkSampleSelectiveMeanShiftBlurringFilterTest (Timeout)
>>> 435 - itkInterpolateImagePointsFilterTest (Timeout)
>>> 603 - itkFEMRegistrationFilterTest (Timeout)
>>> 629 - itkImageRegistrationMethodTest_15 (Timeout)
>>> 645 - itkMRIBiasFieldCorrectionFilterTest (Timeout)
>>> 649 - itkMultiResolutionPDEDeformableRegistrationTest (Timeout)
>>> 667 - itkRegionGrow2DTest (Timeout)
>>> 689 - itkSymmetricForcesDemonsRegistrationFilterTest (Timeout)
>>> 971 - ImageRegistration5oTest2 (Timeout)
>>> 981 - ImageRegistration9Test (Timeout)
>>> 985 - ImageRegistration15Test (Timeout)
>>> 991 - DeformableRegistration3Test (Timeout)
>>> 993 - DeformableRegistration5Test (Timeout)
>>> 1019 - CellularSegmentation1Test (Timeout)
>>>
>>> Is it possible to increase available time for those tests ?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Gaetan
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:29:10 +0200, Karthik Krishnan
>>> <Karthik.Krishnan at kitware.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Something to look forward to in the future maybe :)
>>>>
>>>> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/ITK_Roadmap_2005_2006
>>>>
>>>> "Add Support for parallel testing in CTest"
>>>> This will make possible to launch multiple test simultaneously
>>>> from CTest. In this way, users with multiprocessor machines will
>>>> be able to reduce the time needed for running the test suite.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For now, you can just run memory tests every nth day or limit to
>>>> every nth test...
>>>> http://www.itk.org/Testing/Sites/Sabbath.kitware/Linux-g++-3.4-Shared/20050923-0100-Nightly/Notes.html
>>>> Regards
>>>> karthik
>>>>
>>>> Gaetan Lehmann wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm trying to run the full memory test. This test is very long
>>>>> (more than 24h): it will be a problem to run it each day ;-).
>>>>> I have noticed that only one proc is used during the test, so is
>>>>> there something to do to use the 2 processors ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Gaetan
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Insight-developers mailing list
>>>>> Insight-developers at itk.org
>>>>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Insight-developers mailing list
>Insight-developers at itk.org
>http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>
>
More information about the Insight-developers
mailing list