[Insight-developers] Updating TIFF in ITK

[Rashindra Manniesing]

Finally a complete and successful submission (see below):

http://www.cdash.org/CDash/buildSummary.php?buildid=225830




  Site: bigr-cluster
   Build name: linux-g++-4.1.2-x86_64
Start processing tests
Submit files (using http)
   Using HTTP submit method
   Drop site: http://www.cdash.org/CDash/submit.php?project=Insight
   Uploaded:
/home/rmanniesing/packages/itk-cvs/debug/Testing/20081205-0940/Build.xml
   Uploaded:
/home/rmanniesing/packages/itk-cvs/debug/Testing/20081205-0940/Configure.xml
   Uploaded:
/home/rmanniesing/packages/itk-cvs/debug/Testing/20081205-0940/Test.xml
   Submission successful
Built target ExperimentalSubmit





-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Lorensen [mailto:bill.lorensen at gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 13:55
To: Rashindra Manniesing
Cc: Insight Developers
Subject: Re: Updating TIFF in ITK

Rashindra,

I'm not sure what the problem might be. Perhaps someone else can comment.

Bill

On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Rashindra Manniesing
<r.manniesing at erasmusmc.nl> wrote:
>
> Please check:
>
> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/buildSummary.php?buildid=225706
>
> Using HTTP submit method
>   Drop site: http://www.cdash.org/CDash/submit.php?project=Insight
>   Uploaded:
> /home/rmanniesing/packages/itk-cvs/debug/Testing/20081205-0940/Build.xml
>   Uploaded:
>
/home/rmanniesing/packages/itk-cvs/debug/Testing/20081205-0940/Configure.xml
>   Error when uploading file:
> /home/rmanniesing/packages/itk-cvs/debug/Testing/20081205-0940/Test.xml
>   Error message was: select/poll returned error
>   Problems when submitting via HTTP
>
>
> Not all files have been submitted (doing a make ExperimentalSubmit to try
> again), any suggestions?
>
> rashindra
>
>
>
> HI Bill,
>
> Somehow 'make experimental' remains stuck at submission (using http
> protocol, last line Drop site ...) - should I set some obvious setting
that
> I am missing, like port number?
>
> Rashindra
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Lorensen [mailto:bill.lorensen at gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 16:12
> To: Mathieu Malaterre
> Cc: Rashindra Manniesing; Luis Ibanez; gdcm-developers; Debian Med Project
> List
> Subject: Re: Updating TIFF in ITK
>
> 1) Did you mangle the function names?
> 2) Also, a number of tif files needed changes to avoid warnings on
> some compilers. If you look at:
>
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/Utilities/itktiff/?root=Insigh
> t
> you can see files that have a revision other than 1.1 have changes.
> There is nothing you can do before checking in your changes. This is
> just a reminder that we'll all need to be vigilant about removing the
> warnings.
> 3) What changes do you anticipate in TIFFImageIO? Do all of the itk tests
> pass?
>
> Bill
>
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Mathieu Malaterre
> <mathieu.malaterre at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 'lo
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Rashindra Manniesing
>> <r.manniesing at erasmusmc.nl> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Finally found some time to update the tiff library - checked out cvs,
and
>>> replaced tiff with latest. Everything now compiles (gcc 4.1.2, linux,
> 64b).
>>
>> pretty darn cool !
>>
>>> Now the functions needs to be updated in itkTIFFImageIO - who is
>>> maintaining/wrote these image factory?
>>
>> Julien Jomier might be...
>>
>>> Also, I noticed gdcm was updated to 2.0, which is great! However, 3.10.0
> and
>>> cvs did not have the latest version, or should it still be committed?
>>
>> gdcm 2.0 does not compile with compiler such as VS6. However nothing
>> restrict you from using a system gdcm 2.0 in place of the shipped one.
>> We are currently working on that for debian people.
>>
>> 2cts
>> --
>> Mathieu
>>
>
>