[Insight-developers] Modes versus Objects

[Luis Ibanez]

Bill,

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree regarding code coverage. It would be great to have a machine
> available (just one platform) that developers could use to see the
> coverage of their class.
>


Measuring code coverage locally is not that hard.
I posted yesterday the scrips for doing this with lcov.

It can be done by running a subset of the tests,
which is what we want in order to comply with
the practices and goals of unit testing.


> A first step, would be a cdash filter that shows the coverage for
> requested classes. The current cdash presentation of coverage is not
> useful if you are looking at only a few classes.
>

Agree,



> I for one do not have enough horsepower on my machines to do code coverage.
>