[Insight-developers] Plan to host the SimpleITK git repo here at Kitware

[Bradley Lowekamp]

Hello David,

With the beta scheduled for the 15th of this month I think if it could be done in the next couple of days it would be best. Otherwise it may be best to wait until the beta is tagged so that we have a week to work on cleaning everything up.

Brad

On Jun 3, 2011, at 5:46 PM, David Cole wrote:

> OK... so I'll be out of office next week, but happy to coordinate this
> by email and telephone as needed. Let me know what your preferred date
> is for making the transition, and I'll try to get folks lined up for
> it.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> David C.
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Bradley Lowekamp
> <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I think it makes sense to move the repo to Kitware.
>> 
>> Using Gerrit for SimpleITK user contributions sounds like a good idea. However, for the main development, I really like the branchy work flow. The gerrit system used for ITK squashes long topics into a single commit. By moving the repo I would hope that we can use the staging area as a place to coordinate topics and the next branch. Basically, it should allow us to follow the well documented CMake processes using the ssh commands on the stage.
>> 
>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/CMake/Git#Topic_Stage
>> http://public.kitware.com/Wiki/Git/Workflow/Topic
>> 
>> On Jun 3, 2011, at 9:34 AM, Luis Ibanez wrote:
>> 
>>> Dan,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 1) Do we want to adopt the ITKv4 Git workflow ?
>> 
>> I would prefer to adopt CMake's workflow, to allow for longer topics.
>> 
>>> 2) What are the plans for SimpleITK for the June 15 release ?
>> 
>> We need to lock down the version of ITK we are building against and get SimpleITK building clean again!
>> 
>>> 3) What are the plans for SimpleITK for the Beta release ?
>> 
>> We should review the open issues on Jira and SCRUM it.
>> 
>>> 4) What are the plans for SimpleITK for the final dissemination ?
>> 
>> Correct packaging should be a high priority in 3.
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> We probably should craft all this
>>> in a page on the ITK Wiki.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    Luis
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Blezek, Daniel J.
>>> <Blezek.Daniel at mayo.edu> wrote:
>>>> Hi David,
>>>> 
>>>> Is there a pressing need to move our repo?  Github has been working well and is easily administered by the group.
>>>> 
>>>> -dan
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel Blezek
>>>> blezek.daniel at mayo.edu
>>>> blezek at gmail.com
>>>> Sent from my TI 99/4A
>>>> 
>>>> On Jun 2, 2011, at 3:59 PM, "David Cole" <david.cole at kitware.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi (again) guys,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I've been asked to help transition the SimpleITK git repo to one being hosted here at Kitware (and then automatically mirrored to github).
>>>>> 
>>>>> So. In preparation for that transition, I've asked around a bit and gathered that we'll need to follow these steps:
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Remove all committers from the Github hosted version
>>>>> - Setup the Kitware hosted repo
>>>>> - Setup a robot to automatically mirror changes to github
>>>>> - Inform anyone who doesn't have an account that they need to get one set up
>>>>> 
>>>>> Does this sound reasonable to everyone?
>>>>> When is a good day to plan to make this transition?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I am out of the office next week, but will be on email every day, and the people doing the actual work should be able to schedule it for any weekday that's suitable for all of you.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> David C.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>>