[Insight-developers] SimpleITK saying good by to the old github

[Daniel Blezek]

Brad(s),

  Are we still mirroring the SimpleITK git repo out to Github?  If not, I
would like that turned back on.  Github is a much more visible place for the
project and will aid us if people submit pull requests, etc.  At the
minimum, we must either delete the SimpleITK group or mirror.  I suppose I
could do it via cron...

Best,
-dan


On 6/13/11 6:28 PM, "David Cole" <david.cole at kitware.com> wrote:

> Just as an FYI, with this workflow, you can base new work on an existing topic
> branch, to continue work, even after that branch has been merged to next
> and/or master.
> 
> Simply start the work from the last non-merge commit before merging it to
> next, and then merge to next again after adding one or more continuing
> commits.
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Daniel Blezek <Blezek.Daniel at mayo.edu> wrote:
>> Hi Brad,
>> 
>>  Didn¹t work the first time, and I didn¹t want to break things.  Yet, I
>> needed to base the Java documentation off of this branch, which is why I did
>> the extra commit.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> -dan
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 6/13/11 5:01 PM, "Bradley Lowekamp" <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov
>> <http://blowekamp@mail.nih.gov> > wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> You should have permissions to merge things into next and not next. After we
>>> get the hang of things, more people should get permissions to do this
>>> operation.
>>> 
>>> You had staged a new commit on topic SIMPLEITK-51-AutogenerateDocumentation
>>> and didn't merge into next.
>>> 
>>> I merged this topic to next and then master as discussed at the TCON.
>>> 
>>> Brad
>>> 
>>> On Jun 13, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Daniel Blezek wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Brad,
>>>> 
>>>>  I do not have permission to move things out of the stage (Java work
>>>> requires SIMPLEITK-51-AutogenerateDocumentation).  Can you do this now?
>>>> 
>>>> -dan
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 6/13/11 8:13 AM, "Bradley Lowekamp" <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov
>>>> <http://blowekamp@mail.nih.gov>  <x-msg://141/blowekamp@mail.nih.gov> >
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Do any of the SimpleITK developers have any objection to saying good by to
>>>>> the old Github repository, and replacing it with the mirror of
>>>>> itk.org/SimpleITK.git <http://itk.org/SimpleITK.git> ?
>>>>> <http://itk.org/SimpleITK.git?>  <http://itk.org/SimpleITK.git?>
>>>>> 
>>>>> Brad
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Jun 8, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Brad King wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> b) Where is is going to get synced to?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Add "kwrobot" as a collaborator to the SimpleITK/SimpleITK.git repo
>>>>>> you already have.  Then I can sync itk.org/SimpleITK.git
>>>>>> <http://itk.org/SimpleITK.git>  <http://itk.org/SimpleITK.git>
>>>>>>  <http://itk.org/SimpleITK.git>  out to that.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -Brad K
>>>>> 
>>>>> ========================================================
>>>>> 
>>>>> Bradley Lowekamp
>>>>> 
>>>>> Lockheed Martin Contractor for
>>>>> 
>>>>> Office of High Performance Computing and Communications
>>>>> 
>>>>> National Library of Medicine
>>>>> 
>>>>> blowekamp at mail.nih.gov <http://blowekamp@mail.nih.gov>
>>>>> <x-msg://141/blowekamp@mail.nih.gov>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 

-- 
Daniel Blezek, PhD
Medical Imaging Informatics Innovation Center

P 127 or (77) 8 8886
T 507 538 8886
E blezek.daniel at mayo.edu

Mayo Clinic
200 First St. S.W.
Harwick SL-44
Rochester, MN 55905
mayoclinic.org
"It is more complicated than you think." -- RFC 1925

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/mailman/private/insight-developers/attachments/20110614/5d4f335b/attachment.htm>