[Insight-users] Questions about apodization in the process of
registration
Luis Ibanez
luis.ibanez at kitware.com
Wed Jul 7 18:44:39 EDT 2004
Hi Jay,
The ITK image metrics for which this effect is relevant are already
normalized by the number of pixels in the overlapping region.
Those are
- MeanSquaresImageToImageMetric
- NormalizedCorrelationImageToImageMetric
If you are concerned about other metrics being subject to such
discontinuities you can verify your hypotesis by simply exploring
a range of the parametric space in a translation transform.
That will give you metric plots like those shown on the SoftwareGuide,
http://www.itk.org/ItkSoftwareGuide.pdf
from those Metric plots you can judge how relevant the eventual
discontinuities may be.
Regards,
Luis
------------------
Jay Li wrote:
> Dear Luis,
>
> Thank you for your reply. Sorry that I was not able to feed back
> promptly. I didn't express the question clearly in my previous email.
>
> During the registration process, the metric will be calculated based
> on the overlap of the fixed and moving image for each iteration. Since
> the area of the overlap may change for each iteration, the number of
> total pixels counted as the overlap may change, so the value of metric
> may have discontinuity that might cause the failure in finding the
> global extreme.
>
> To avoid above, different weights could be given to pixels or voxels
> within the overlap. For example, when calculating the metric, pixels
> near the boundary are given lower weights, but those ones near the
> center are given higher weights. I don't know if ITK has done this
> kind of stuff. Thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jay
>
>
>
> */Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com>/* wrote:
>
>
> Hi Jay,
>
> By apodization do you refer to the attenuation of
> the high frequencies in the spectral domain of the
> images ?
>
> I assume that you are concerned about this due to the
> resampling of the images during the registration process
> as well as after the transform has been extracted.
>
> If that's the case, you don't really need to be too
> concerned. It practice this is rarely a problem, unless
> your images are actually populated with white noise,
> or at least blue noise, which are the type of spectra
> having large components in the high frequency range and
> therefore requiring attenuation in order to avoid aliasing
> during the interpolation used for resampling.
>
> For typical medical images, the high frequency components
> are very low, and you are usually safe by using simple
> interpolations. That is, the Fourier transform of the
> shape functions used by typical interpolation are already
> attenuatting high frequencies.
>
> You may want to look at the documentation of the
> SincWindowed interpolator where some of this issues
> are discussed.
>
>
> From the practical point of view your best options
> for avoiding local minima are :
>
> - Multi-resolution
> - Good initialization
>
>
>
> Please let us know if you have further questions.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Luis
>
>
>
> -----------------
> Jay Li wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I'm new to ITK. Could anyone give me a hint if ITK has
> > taken care of the apodization related problems in the
> > process of image registration. I looked through the
> > manual and searched the online archives, but couldn't
> > find anything related. Will there be any problems to
> > find the global extreme without the apodization?
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Jay
> > *>
> >
>
>
>
> *
>
> * *
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/aac/*http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail/static/ease.html>
> - You start. We finish. *
>
>*
>*
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>*
>_______________________________________________
>Insight-users mailing list
>Insight-users at itk.org
>http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
>*
>
More information about the Insight-users
mailing list