[Insight-users] Re: Landmark Based transform initializer

[Kevin H. Hobbs]

On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 13:25 -0400, Kevin H. Hobbs wrote: 
> On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 12:01 -0400, Karthik Krishnan wrote:
>  We will try to add one for affine and corresponding rigid/affine ones for 2D, 

Will this class function at all for 2D images? Would 2D images with 2
landmark points each, produce undefined, or just wrong, results?

Something causes a segfault in the code using vtkLandmarkTransform that
I posted yesterday,

http://crab-lab.zool.ohiou.edu/kevin/Slice_Landmark_Registration/landmark_transform.cxx

If I comment out line 55 or 59 so that the transform never gets to the
reader, or is the identity transform, then the segfault goes away.

I'm likely doing something stupid involving a 3D transform on 2D data.
Does this mean the same thing would happen with the new ITK class?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-users/attachments/20050520/362946ec/attachment.pgp