[Insight-users] Insight Journal submission: problems at every
step of the way.
Julien Jomier
jjomier at cs.unc.edu
Thu Feb 2 00:01:44 EST 2006
Hi Zach,
I completely understand your disappointment and I want to thank you for
pursing the different issues and providing a very descriptive and useful
explanation of them.
Problem 1 sounds like a bug, at the end of the MIDAS process you should
be redirected to the main Insight Journal webpage to finish your
publication. I'll take a look at this problem.
Problem 2: you can upload the files as one archive or multiple files, it
shouldn't matter. Regarding the .tgz files I will take a look, but they
are supported.
Problem 3. You should specify what ITK version you want to use. Like
ITK2.4.1 in your CMakeLists.txt.
Problem 4. Sounds like a bug. I just fixed it. You should be able to
upload a new file, otherwise let me know.
Just to let you know, the Insight Journal was implemented in a short
amount of time and we know that it is not optimal. We are currently in
the process of improving it, especially the submission of new revisions
(via cvs/svn) and the documentation. It should be better in the near future.
Again, I'd like to thank you for improving the Insight Journal, let me
know if I can do anything to help.
Julien
Zachary Pincus wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I just submitted a brief Insight Journal submission describing a 2D
> image contour extraction filter that I wrote, which I hope will prove
> useful and merit inclusion in ITK. Unfortunately, I have had some
> problems with this entire process, culminating in my code not building
> because of some bizarre configuration issue on the build machine that I
> of course cannot diagnose, and then being unable to submit a revision to
> said code in the hopes of remotely diagnosing the problem.
>
> Here is a list of the problems I have encountered today with the Insight
> Journal.
>
> Problem 0 is the simple fact that documentation for this entire process
> is scattered across at least two wikis (the itk wiki, and the insight
> software colloquium wiki), with important information (like the latex
> and source code templates for submission) only available on the itk
> wiki. Figuring out what, precisely, I needed to do and how to do it took
> far too long.
>
> Problem 1 was that despite the fact that at the end of the new
> submission process, I clicked "finish" and got an email saying that the
> submission had been accepted, the paper did not show up in the Insight
> Journal. Only after I clicked on "My Publications" and saw at the end of
> the line a "finish publication" did I find yet more steps to complete. I
> guess I clicked only on the "finish" button inside the MIDAS frame, but
> perhaps not on the finish button outside of the frame? Having two finish
> buttons to press is confusing and counterintuitive.
>
> Problem 2 centers around including source files for the automated build
> system. Nowhere was it particularly well-explained that source code
> should be uploaded alongside the article file -- I spent some time
> searching for a specific entry point to upload source for the automated
> build program. Only on my third perusal of
> http://www.insightsoftwareconsortium.org/wiki/index.php/IJ-Testing-Environment
> did I notice that source should be uploaded as a secondary file and the
> build script will find it there.
>
> So, I included a Source.tgz archive as a secondary file. However, tgz
> files are marked as unsupported and the upload process gave me trouble
> about that, despite the fact that the build system apparently had no
> problem opening it.
>
> Problem 3 is that the code will not build on the test system. The
> problem is that the #define'd constant ITK_LOCATION (defined in
> itkMacro.h) is mysteriously unavailable to my code on the build machine,
> despite the fact that this constant is used throughout the ITK codebase
> (grep for it), and itkMacro.h should have been included properly. The
> same code compiles fine on my machine, where header files are properly
> included.
>
> Problem 4 came when I tried to fix the build issue. On the "My
> Publications" link, there are two options: "modify revision" and "post a
> new revision." Surprisingly, "modify revision" in no way allows you to
> modify the revision. It just allows the exact same revision to be
> re-posted. How this is a modification is beyond me. The "post new
> revision" link then takes me to an extremely confusing frame with the
> directions to "Scroll down the frame and click on 'Add Bitstream'." When
> I did this and attempted to upload a new version of the PDF and
> source.tgz, I was provided with an AUTHORIZATION REQUIRED page because
> the operation was not permitted. So I can't add a new file, and so I
> can't even begin to try to diagnose why the build fails on the build
> machine.
>
> All in all, this process has been extremely frustrating. Though I
> support the intention behind this all, the fact is that I've spent a day
> writing a "journal submission" describing an algorithm that is as old as
> the hills and whose implementation is straightforward (and exceptionally
> thoroughly documented in the code itself), and was then rewarded with
> getting to spend all evening fiddling around with the submit process.
> This is not a good use of my time.
>
> Next time I write code for a basic, classic image processing method that
> ITK needs but does not have for some reason, I'll have to think twice
> about bothering to deal with all of this.
>
> Zach
>
> _______________________________________________
> Insight-users mailing list
> Insight-users at itk.org
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
>
More information about the Insight-users
mailing list