[Insight-users] binary deformable registration

Siddharth Vikal siddharthvikal at gmail.com
Tue Sep 12 21:32:36 EDT 2006


Hello ITK users,

I've been trying to do deformable registration of two segmented binary
volumes (256x256x26). The volumes are first rigidly registered. Rigid
registration achieves me more than 80% overlap. Now I need to improve
further by correcting for shape deformation. I've tried the following:

1) FEM based deformable registration, since I have rough idea of
tissue properties (Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio) from pertinent
literature. I chose mean squares metric as Kappa/Cardinality metric
suitable for binary is not in current FEM framework; Further I chose 4
pixels/element for mesh generation. The code runs and apparently
converges but there is no real improvement in registration.

2) Kappa + BSpline transform

3) Cardinality + BSpline transform

I haven't had improvement in registration with any of above three
methods. Besides, method (2) and (3) are extremely time-consuming
(order of an hour)
Now since the organ of interest is already segmented and
rigid-registered, shouldn't it be easier to perform deformable
registration?

Please advice me.

thanks,
best regards,
siddharth


More information about the Insight-users mailing list