[Insight-users] Missing static const SpaceDimension in itkRigid2DTransform.h

[Luis Ibanez]

Hi Ralf,

The fixes have been committed to CVS.
Please update your CVS checkout of ITK.


   Regards,


       Luis


-----------------------
Luis Ibanez wrote:
> 
> Hi Ralf,
> 
> 
>               Thanks for pointing this out.
> 
> 
> The declaration of "SpaceDimension" in the CenterTransformInitializer
> is an Evolutionary vestige that dates from the time when ITK transforms
> assumed that the input space and output space had the same dimension.
> 
> At this point, this declaration is not being used, and should be
> removed.
> 
> This issue has been entered as bug 4845:
> http://public.kitware.com/Bug/bug.php?op=show&bugid=4845&pos=0
> 
> 
> We should be able to commit a fix for it today.
> 
> 
> About the options for searching in the bug tracker.
> There is an advanced search available. Unfortunately
> it is not very visible. You will find it by clicking
> on the "Query Bugs" button a the top bar. In the page
> that follows, you will see the advance query option
> as the link at the bottom left of the page.
> 
> Please let us know if you find any difficulties
> using the search functionality of the bug tracker.
> 
> 
>   Thanks
> 
> 
>      Luis
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------
> Floca, Ralf wrote:
> 
>> Hello
>>
>> In the itkRigid2DTransform.h the itkStaticConstMacro for SpaceDimension
>> is missing. It is defined in the superclass, but not in the
>> itk::Rigid2Dtransform.
>> When using this transform and the itk::CenteredTransformInitializer
>> (compiled with Visual Studio 2005 SP1) there will be a compile error.
>> The error is caused by line 83 in the itkCenteredTransformInitializer.h
>> because the compiler misses SpaceDimension in the transform.
>>
>> The problem can solved by adding the itkStaticConstMacro for
>> SpaceDimension to the itk::Rigid2DTransform.
>>
>> I have also question concerning bug reporting. I have an account for the
>> bug tracker and would add this error report my self, but for me it is
>> hard to determine if the bug is already reported. I had no hits when
>> using the search option and choosing supposedly appropriate search words
>> for the description field. But I cannot be totally sure and going
>> through all 684 bugs reported for itk could be very tedious. Is there a
>> way to query explicitly for files/bug locations?
>> Or shouldn't I care about the problem of double reporting as long as I
>> cannot find it in the recent bug list and with an advanced query by
>> supposedly fitting keywords.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ralf o Floca
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Ralf Floca
>> Department of Medical Informatics
>> University of Heidelberg                           Im Neuenheimer Feld 
>> 400            D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany               Phone: +49 
>> (0)6221 56-7484
>> Fax:                 -4997  http://www.klinikum.uni-heidelberg.de/mi 
>> ralf.floca at med.uni-heidelberg.de
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> Insight-users mailing list
>> Insight-users at itk.org
>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
>>
>