[Insight-users] Performance of ModifiedTime increments

[Tom Vercauteren]

Hi Sean,

The bug, patch and unit test are in the bug tracker:
http://www.itk.org/Bug/view.php?id=6599

It would be great if it could be included in ITK 3.6

Best,
Tom

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Tom Vercauteren
<tom.vercauteren at m4x.org> wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
>  Thanks for your feedback! I should have searched more carefully.
>
>
>  >  itkTimeStamp does too, but only on Windows and Mac.  Which OS are you
>  >  using?  Which version of ITK?
>  My mistake... I should have looked in the CVS repository. I am using
>  ITK 3.4 on both mac and linux which were both suffering from the
>  botteneck since the optimization is only present in the CVS.
>
>
>  >  >It seems that this can be fairly
>  >  >easily done at least on gcc by using the __atomic_add function in the
>  >  >atomicity.h header file (see atomic_count.hpp in boost for a
>  >  >cross-platform implementation).
>  >
>  >  Indeed.  Care to try and submit a bug with patch?
>  I'll submit a bug report with a patch for gcc today or tomorrow.
>
>  Best,
>  Tom
>