[Insight-users] [Insight-developers] ITK Tcon 2.0 today, Agenda

[Dan Mueller]

Hi Lius,

I can not attend the Tcon (is that still a good name?) today, but I am
curious what process is used to determine the transfer of Insight
Journal papers to the review folder.

Some of the articles being considered for inclusion (as listed on the
Wiki agenda) are quite new, in fact the only submission which has been
reviewed by a human is #301. So why are these new publications with no
reviews being considered over publications with proven applicability
(more views/downloads) and quality (more human reviews)?

Take for example:
   http://www.insight-journal.org/browse/publication/179
It was originally submitted over 12 months ago, has considerable views
and downloads (views: 1955, downloads: 716), and two human reviews. (I
must concede the automated tests are not 100% at the moment, but if
the paper was considered for inclusion, I'm sure the author could
rectify that). There are of course other examples, however this is one
that I personally want to see in ITK proper.

Is the process of transfer from IJ to review folder simply a developer
or user saying to the ITK gatekeepers: "hey, I want such and such
paper considered for inclusion"?

Cheers, Dan

2008/9/19 Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com>:
>
> The agenda for today's ITK Tcon 2.0 is now available in the Wiki.
>
>    http://www.itk.org/Wiki/Agenda%26Status_091908
>
> We will discuss:
>
>  * The release schedule for ITK 3.10
>  * Moving papers from the Insight Journal into the Review dir
>  * itk::Image behaving like itk::OrientedImage
>  * Lesion sizing toolkit in development
>  * ImageIO API for GUI support
>
> Please feel free to add any topics.
>
>
> Instructions to join the Tcon are available at
>
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_in_Second_Life
>
>
>  Thanks
>
>
>     Luis
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Insight-developers mailing list
> Insight-developers at itk.org
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>