[Insight-users] Advection in ThresholdLevelSetImageFilter
Luis Ibanez
luis.ibanez at kitware.com
Mon Sep 22 12:30:13 EDT 2008
Hi Dario,
Yes, the EdgeWeight plays in the ThresholdSegmentationLevelSet
a simlar role to the AdvectionWeight in the GeodesicActiveContour.
When you set the EdgeWeight to non-zero, the filter computes a
Laplacian and uses it to drive the zero set closer to the
zero-crossings of the Laplacian.
The SmoothingConductance is used as a parameter for the Gradient
Anisotropic diffusion filter that is used inside of the Threshold
SegmentationLevelSetFunction, to smooth the image before computing
the Laplacian on it. Otherwise, the Laplacian will find a large
number of zero-crossings in all the small details (high spatial
frequency) of the image.
BTW: You can review all this by simply looking at the source code
of the file:
Insight/Code/Algorithms/
itkThresholdSegmentationLevelSetFunction.txx
in particular by looking at
lines 43-57:
=============
if (m_EdgeWeight != 0.0)
{
diffusion->SetInput(this->GetFeatureImage());
diffusion->SetConductanceParameter(m_SmoothingConductance);
diffusion->SetTimeStep(m_SmoothingTimeStep);
diffusion->SetNumberOfIterations(m_SmoothingIterations);
laplacian->SetInput(diffusion->GetOutput());
laplacian->Update();
lit = ImageRegionIterator<FeatureImageType>(laplacian->GetOutput(),
this->GetFeatureImage()->GetRequestedRegion());
lit.GoToBegin();
}
and lines 77-85:
================
if ( m_EdgeWeight != 0.0)
{
sit.Set( static_cast<ScalarValueType>(threshold + m_EdgeWeight *
lit.Get()) );
++lit;
}
else
{
sit.Set( static_cast<ScalarValueType>(threshold) );
}
----------------
"Glimpsing at the Source leaves no Doubt"
Regards,
Luis
-----------------------
Dário Oliveira wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I guess I miss something here. Why the advection scaling term is not
> applied in ThresholdLevelSetImageFilter? I performed some tests, and
> the value of advection scaling term makes no difference at all in the
> final result. Does the EdgeWeight term play the role of advection
> scaling?
>
> Another question... What does the smoothing conductance term?
>
> Thanks for your attention!
More information about the Insight-users
mailing list