[Insight-users] Fedora-RHEL packages: Status of "Patented" and "Review" directories

[Steve M. Robbins]

On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 04:18:32PM +0100, Mario Ceresa wrote:
> Hello Ga?tan,
> please forgive me if I address you directly, but I have a question on
> packaging wrapitk for Fedora.
> 
> Following the suggestions from Luis Ibanez, I'll not package neither
> Patented nor Review folder to avoid licensing issues.
> 
> I might be wrong, but it seems to me that wrapitk needs Review to be
> enabled in order to work.
> 
> Is it correct?
> 
> If so, is there any way I could help removing this dependency?

I'm interested in the same question.  We'd like to switch Debian's
packaging to use the new wrapping, but we are not able to distribute
Review.

Thanks,
-Steve
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://www.itk.org/pipermail/insight-users/attachments/20091206/c1663a55/attachment.pgp>