[Insight-users] "Zoom -> Paste -> Write" pipeline problem

Arturo Caissut arturo_caissut at tiscali.it
Fri Sep 11 07:54:38 EDT 2009


Do I have to use the Scale method of an itkTransform too, to avoid the
output image of the ResampleImageFilter to cut off the interesting part?
> Bill Lorensen ha scritto:
>   
>> You can use ResampleImageFilter to "zoom". Be sure to use the
>> NearestNeighborInterpolateImageFunction since the atlas is segmented
>> and not continuous data.
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Arturo Caissut
>> <arturo_caissut at tiscali.it> wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm in a little trouble with the final part of a small utility I'm
>>> writing, and I'd appreciate very much your help to solve it, as usual.
>>>
>>> The goal of the program I'm writing is to extract one off the 116 parts
>>> of the Tzourio-Mazoyer's AAL atlas from it, and then save such a part on
>>> an arbitrary sized 3D image. It doesn't really matter where this
>>> segmented part is situated, nor if it is scaled (in a geometrical sense)
>>> or not, since the output of my program is supposed to become the input
>>> of another tool I already wrote, that makes the user able to adjust size
>>> and position of the segmented image at will: I just need a bunch of
>>> correctly shaped white pixels somewhere on a black image, with the only
>>> (deadly for me) condition that atlas image and output image must have
>>> the same voxel size.
>>>
>>> I wrote all the related and unrelated stuff, then I started with a
>>> threshold filter to obtain an RGB image with black background and white
>>> voxels where the segmented part is situated. It obviously worked. Now,
>>> since I don't know which part my user should want to obtain, I won't try
>>> to "cut away" at runtime a right sized area around the segmented part to
>>> save it as an output image, but I'll reduce (or enlarge) the whole atlas
>>> thresholded image (let's call this "the atlas size segmented image")
>>> instead, and then I'll paste such a reduced (or enlarged) version of the
>>> image on a black properly sized "collector" image I created.
>>>
>>> Needing a way to "zoom" the atlas segmented image, I thought I could
>>> easily do it by resetting its spacing and regions values (multiplying
>>> these values by a "scale" needed factor deduced comparing the output
>>> dimensions with the original ones), but shall I be able to paste an
>>> image with -let's say- spacing = (0.5, 0.5, 0.5) on another one with
>>> spacing = (1, 1, 1)? Since ITK has a "pixel based mind", I think that'd
>>> be a mistake, wouldn't it?
>>> Perhaps I should try an "hybrid" approach and copy the atlas size
>>> segmented image on a vtkImageData to handle the image from an "higher"
>>> point of view?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you for your time, I'm sorry if I've been a little chaotic in
>>> explaining my situation but it's 3 am here and I've worked at this
>>> project for three full days now, so I really, really, REALLY need to sleep.
>>> Arturo
>>> _____________________________________
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at: http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
>>>
>>>     
>>>       
>>   
>>     
>
>
>   



More information about the Insight-users mailing list