[Insight-users] [Insight-developers] Tcon Agenda Posted (Tuesday 1pm EST)

Tue Aug 10 12:34:10 EDT 2010

yes,

thank you luis.

alex.

On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com> wrote:
>
> Alex,
>
> Good point.
>
> The consensus is to schedule an independent
> tcon for talking about ITKv4 & Microscopy.
>
>
> I just rearranged the agenda according to
> your suggestions:
>
>
> 3 Technical Topics
>
> 3.1 Stable ITK 3.20
> 3.2 DICOM
> 3.3 Simple ITK
> 3.4 Wrapping
> 3.5 Refactoring Optimization Framework
> 3.6 Modularization
> 3.7 Microscopy
>
> The immediate activity to tackle is DICOM and
> the update to GDCM 2.0, that includes the upgrade
> of openjpeg to "v2".
>
> In the same pass we will introduce the JPEG2000Image
> that Kishore just posted to the Insight Journal.
>
> The plan is to cut that release by the end of this week.
>
> Does this address your concerns ?
>
>
>     Luis
>
>
> ---------------------------------------
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Alexandre GOUAILLARD
> <agouaillard at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> hi all,
>>
>> I really think the questions raised by the microscopy community are
>> great and should be addressed. I would be very happy to participate to
>> the discussion and maybe bring in some ideas. There are tough
>> questions though, that have been presented numerous time to the
>> community already without a clear answer so far. They deserve the
>> right amount of time for people to think about it. Also, I do not
>> think that any core itk-v4 contract was awarded for that, correct?
>>
>> Unfortunately, we are on a very tight schedule for v4 core, and some
>> core questions (simple itk, wrapping, dicom, ....) haven't been
>> discussed about for almost three weeks now. I am wondering (out loud)
>> if this is the right time and place fr this discussion.
>>
>> We should have sent the draft for T.O.2 one week ago already, and I m
>> concerned that we wouldn't be able to converge on those three (and
>> more) points this week again if we started with microscopy. I know
>> this is a concern for many people as bill, luis and other suggested
>> that the agenda be reversed for that exact same reason. I suggest we
>> had microscopy to the agenda, not to forget about it, but lower than
>> the itk-v4 core points, especially those that haven't been adressed
>> for three weeks.
>>
>> regards.
>>
>> alex.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Brad, Arnaud,
>> >
>> > Yes, let's do that then.
>> >
>> > 1) Quick summary on tomorrow's tcon, and
>> >
>> > 2) Schedule a separate tcon to focus on Microscopy.
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > For (2):
>> > How about Wednesday or Thursday afternoon  ?
>> >
>> > (or we could pick a time tomorrow during the tcon).
>> >
>> >
>> >     Luis
>> >
>> >
>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Arnaud GELAS
>> > <arnaud_gelas at hms.harvard.edu>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Brad,
>> >>
>> >> I think we should do both, first to present problems from the
>> >> microscopy
>> >> community. At least everyone can understand some of the related
>> >> problems in
>> >> terms of design. Then interested people and people that have ideas on
>> >> how to
>> >> address these issues can then meet in another break out t-con.
>> >>
>> >> It seems to be important to discuss at least in the main t-conf:
>> >>
>> >> how to deal with time?
>> >> how to deal with channels? (Note that for one channel, the pixel type
>> >> could be a scalar, vector or tensor)...
>> >>
>> >> Then we could discuss other details in the break out one...
>> >>
>> >> Arnaud
>> >>
>> >> On 08/09/2010 03:06 PM, Bradley Lowekamp wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello Luis,
>> >> Looking over the agenda for tomorrow, I can't help but think  that the
>> >> Microscopy should be a break out t-con (unless I missed it, and this is
>> >> a
>> >> summary). I have had experience with streaming and many related issues
>> >> to
>> >> the large datasets complications, so I would like to participate in
>> >> such a
>> >> break out.
>> >> Perhaps the agenda item should just be to schedule such a meeting?
>> >> Brad
>> >> On Aug 9, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Luis Ibanez wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The Agenda for tomorrow's tcon has been posted at:
>> >>
>> >> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/Agenda%26Status_081010
>> >>
>> >> As discussed in the last tcon,
>> >> we are inverting the order of the agenda,
>> >> in order to address some topics for which
>> >> we have run out of time in previous calls.
>> >>
>> >> Please feel free to add any topics of your interest.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>     Luis
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> <ATT00001..txt>
>> >>
>> >> ========================================================
>> >>
>> >> Bradley Lowekamp
>> >>
>> >> Lockheed Martin Contractor for
>> >>
>> >> Office of High Performance Computing and Communications
>> >>
>> >> National Library of Medicine
>> >>
>> >> blowekamp at mail.nih.gov
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Powered by www.kitware.com
>> >
>> > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>> >
>> > Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>> > http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>> >
>> > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>> > http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>> >
>> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> > http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>> >
>> >
>
>