[Insight-users] [Insight-developers] Tcon Agenda Posted (Tuesday 1pm EST)

Tue Aug 10 20:01:47 EDT 2010

Yeap, we are still working out of the draft
migration plan, and execution has already
deviated somehow.

I'll suggest that we include Brad Lowekamps'
changes tomorrow, and the cut ITKv4-A-01
on Thursday.

Then we move to update third party libraries,
in particular openjpeg (but also TIFF, PNG..).
and tag that version as well (without GDCM 2.0
update yet).  Cut there A-02

Then do a pass to simplifying CMake flags,
and redefining their defaults (when needed).
Cut there A-03.

Finally include GDCM 2.0, and cut A-04.

At that point we close the wider review of
the toolkit and spawn topic branches.

BTW, One new topic branch must be
dedicated to fixing the 64 bits issue on
Windows.

Does that sound reasonable ?

      Luis

----------------------------------------------------
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Bradley Lowekamp
<blowekamp at mail.nih.gov>wrote:

> Yes,
> I believe the schedule needs a revisions and update, as A-01, A-02, A-03
> seem to be blurring together. I suppose, I expected some tags, there to
> branch new work off at each phase.
>
> Brad
>
> On Aug 10, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Alexandre GOUAILLARD wrote:
>
> hi luis,
>
> I see an inconsistency in the planning.
>
> the drawing of the versions of v4 states the release of itk v4
> including gdcm 2.0 and jpeg2000 for august 21st. However, in the dicom
> section, you wrote saturday 14th?
>
> I haven't asked mathieu yet, but I'm pretty sure he was aiming for
> 21st and 14th would be unrealistic.
>
> alex.
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> Alex,
>
>
> Good point.
>
>
> The consensus is to schedule an independent
>
> tcon for talking about ITKv4 & Microscopy.
>
>
>
> I just rearranged the agenda according to
>
> your suggestions:
>
>
>
> 3 Technical Topics
>
>
> 3.1 Stable ITK 3.20
>
> 3.2 DICOM
>
> 3.3 Simple ITK
>
> 3.4 Wrapping
>
> 3.5 Refactoring Optimization Framework
>
> 3.6 Modularization
>
> 3.7 Microscopy
>
>
> The immediate activity to tackle is DICOM and
>
> the update to GDCM 2.0, that includes the upgrade
>
> of openjpeg to "v2".
>
>
> In the same pass we will introduce the JPEG2000Image
>
> that Kishore just posted to the Insight Journal.
>
>
> The plan is to cut that release by the end of this week.
>
>
> Does this address your concerns ?
>
>
>
>     Luis
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------
>
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Alexandre GOUAILLARD
>
> <agouaillard at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> hi all,
>
>
> I really think the questions raised by the microscopy community are
>
> great and should be addressed. I would be very happy to participate to
>
> the discussion and maybe bring in some ideas. There are tough
>
> questions though, that have been presented numerous time to the
>
> community already without a clear answer so far. They deserve the
>
> right amount of time for people to think about it. Also, I do not
>
> think that any core itk-v4 contract was awarded for that, correct?
>
>
> Unfortunately, we are on a very tight schedule for v4 core, and some
>
> core questions (simple itk, wrapping, dicom, ....) haven't been
>
> discussed about for almost three weeks now. I am wondering (out loud)
>
> if this is the right time and place fr this discussion.
>
>
> We should have sent the draft for T.O.2 one week ago already, and I m
>
> concerned that we wouldn't be able to converge on those three (and
>
> more) points this week again if we started with microscopy. I know
>
> this is a concern for many people as bill, luis and other suggested
>
> that the agenda be reversed for that exact same reason. I suggest we
>
> had microscopy to the agenda, not to forget about it, but lower than
>
> the itk-v4 core points, especially those that haven't been adressed
>
> for three weeks.
>
>
> regards.
>
>
> alex.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com>
>
> wrote:
>
>
> Brad, Arnaud,
>
>
> Yes, let's do that then.
>
>
> 1) Quick summary on tomorrow's tcon, and
>
>
> 2) Schedule a separate tcon to focus on Microscopy.
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> For (2):
>
> How about Wednesday or Thursday afternoon  ?
>
>
> (or we could pick a time tomorrow during the tcon).
>
>
>
>     Luis
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Arnaud GELAS
>
> <arnaud_gelas at hms.harvard.edu>
>
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Brad,
>
>
> I think we should do both, first to present problems from the
>
> microscopy
>
> community. At least everyone can understand some of the related
>
> problems in
>
> terms of design. Then interested people and people that have ideas on
>
> how to
>
> address these issues can then meet in another break out t-con.
>
>
> It seems to be important to discuss at least in the main t-conf:
>
>
> how to deal with time?
>
> how to deal with channels? (Note that for one channel, the pixel type
>
> could be a scalar, vector or tensor)...
>
>
> Then we could discuss other details in the break out one...
>
>
> Arnaud
>
>
> On 08/09/2010 03:06 PM, Bradley Lowekamp wrote:
>
>
> Hello Luis,
>
> Looking over the agenda for tomorrow, I can't help but think  that the
>
> Microscopy should be a break out t-con (unless I missed it, and this is
>
> a
>
> summary). I have had experience with streaming and many related issues
>
> to
>
> the large datasets complications, so I would like to participate in
>
> such a
>
> break out.
>
> Perhaps the agenda item should just be to schedule such a meeting?
>
> Brad
>
> On Aug 9, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Luis Ibanez wrote:
>
>
> The Agenda for tomorrow's tcon has been posted at:
>
>
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/Agenda%26Status_081010
>
>
> As discussed in the last tcon,
>
> we are inverting the order of the agenda,
>
> in order to address some topics for which
>
> we have run out of time in previous calls.
>
>
> Please feel free to add any topics of your interest.
>
>
>
>     Luis
>
>
>
> <ATT00001..txt>
>
>
> ========================================================
>
>
> Bradley Lowekamp
>
>
> Lockheed Martin Contractor for
>
>
> Office of High Performance Computing and Communications
>
>
> National Library of Medicine
>
>
> blowekamp at mail.nih.gov
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
>
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>
>
> ========================================================
>
> Bradley Lowekamp
>
> Lockheed Martin Contractor for
>
> Office of High Performance Computing and Communications
>
> National Library of Medicine
>
> blowekamp at mail.nih.gov
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/pipermail/insight-users/attachments/20100810/0eec9c8c/attachment-0001.htm>