[Insight-users] force to destroy object

[Xiaofeng Z]

> In a well designed application, ideally, there will be
> only one such pointer at a time, while other classes
> that need to access the object will use raw pointers.
>
I don't understand the rationale of your above statement.  Does this defeats 
the purpose of smarter pointer since by doing this, the only help the smart 
pointer does is to automatically delete the object.  Please enlighten!

xz