[Insight-users] Optimizing multiple parallel pipeline execution

[Sergio Vera]

Hello!

I would like to know the best way to put the Update() call in the following
situation:


Let's suppose the following pipelines:

Img -> Filter1
 |
 v
Filter2
 |
 v
Filter3

I hope that the ASCII scheme is clear enough: An image is given to two
separated pipelines. Usually, I put the Update() call to the lastest filter
the pipelines (in this case I would put two separated  updates at Filter1
and Filter3) However, this would make the pipelines executed sequentially.

However, I've thought that if I put a single Update() Call on Img instead of
a Filter, maybe ITK's internal streaming/threading capabilities may be able
to optimize the pipeline's execution saving memory/time.

Is this possible?

Regards


-- 
Sergio Vera

Alma IT Systems
C/ Vilana, 4B, 4º 1ª
08022 Barcelona
T. (+34) 932 380 592
www.alma3d.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/pipermail/insight-users/attachments/20100628/65d97704/attachment.htm>