[Insight-users] FunctionBase wrapper for classes in itk::Function::
Luis Ibanez
luis.ibanez at kitware.com
Sun Sep 12 12:54:32 EDT 2010
Hi Matthew,
I'm not sure I understand your question.
So, let me sketch it in code,...
It seems that you want something like:
class MyClass
{
public:
class MyFunction
{
public:
};
};
where MyFunction should be any of the functions
in the itk::Function namespace....
Could you cite an example ?
---
Any reason for not using the Functor approach ?
where your class MyClass is templated over the
function type.
As in the UnaryFunctorImageFilter ?
template < class TFunctor>
class MyClass
{
public:
TFunctor MyFunction;
};
Please let us know,
Thanks
Luis
------------------------------------
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Matthew McCormick (thewtex) <
matt at mmmccormick.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to have a class member that is a function that is not a
> specific class. This suggests I should just use FunctionBase. However, the
> type of functions I would like to use are the ones in the itk::Function::
> namespace. These classes do not seem to inherit from anything. Is there
> any class that acts a wrapper for these classes as a FunctionBase?
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
> _____________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://www.kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/pipermail/insight-users/attachments/20100912/f528d266/attachment.htm>
More information about the Insight-users
mailing list