[Insight-users] Observations about Amoeba, ConjugateGradient and LBFGS optimizers
Efthymios Efstathiou
efstates at iis.fraunhofer.de
Tue Sep 21 10:35:20 EDT 2010
Hi all,
I'm currently using ITK (3.16) for the registration of ultrasound
images, making use of various metrics and optimizers.
I just observed some strange behaviour of some optimizers and would like
to share it with you and request your help regarding these issues.
1) The Amoeba, ConjugateGradient and LBFGS optimizers produce false
outputs by their GetCurrentPosition() (empty output position vector) and
GetCurrentIteration() (always 0, not updated) methods, whereas by their
GetValue() methods, they throw an exception. That leads me to the point
that there are not any current data available for these optimizers. In
order to get some values to display for tracing the progress of the
optimization I'm using the "cached" versions of the above functions
where available, which may not provide a value with accordance to the
current parameters.
2) The ConjugateGradient optimizer in most cases after some iterations,
having already found the optimal value and having stayed there for
another few iterations, makes some new steps and reaches a position
where the metric throws an exception because the images do not overlap
at that position. This observation was also made some years ago:
http://www.itk.org/pipermail/insight-users/2005-June/013812.html
Thank you in advance for your time and help.
Best regrads,
Efthymios Efstathiou
More information about the Insight-users
mailing list