[Insight-users] wn64 error on itkMeshFileReadWriteTest06

[wanlin]

Hi, Alex
     Xiaoxiao has alread put the patch to
http://review.source.kitware.com/#change,3457


wanlin

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Alexandre GOUAILLARD
<agouaillard at gmail.com>wrote:

> wanlin, there is no patch attached to your email.
>
> alex.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:20 PM, wanlin <wanlinzhu at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Xiaoxiao,
> >     Thank for pointing out these mistakes. It's weired that i didn't find
> > the mistakes in the previous tests. There are two mistakes in the code. I
> > made some patches for it. However due to the network constraint, i could
> not
> > conduct tests on my laptop. Could you please help me push them to
> > http://review.source.kitware.com/#change,3457
> >
> >
> > thanks and regards
> >
> >
> > wanlin
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Xiaoxiao Liu <xiaoxiao.liu at kitware.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Wanlin,
> >> Will you please take a look at this win64 error?:
> >> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=123324636&build=1794079
> >>
> >>
> >> The baseline mesh file has :
> >> 1       8       6      24
> >>        1       6
> >>  0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00
> >>  1.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00
> >>  1.00000E+00 2.00000E+00 0.00000E+00
> >>  0.00000E+00 2.00000E+00 0.00000E+00
> >>  0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 1.00000E+00
> >>  1.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 1.00000E+00
> >>  1.00000E+00 2.00000E+00 1.00000E+00
> >>  0.00000E+00 2.00000E+00 1.00000E+00
> >>        4       3       2      -1
> >>        5       6       7      -8
> >>        1       5       8      -4
> >>        4       8       7      -3
> >>        3       7       6      -2
> >>        2       6       5      -1
> >>
> >> and the output file from the win64 machine is :
> >>     1       8       6       12
> >>        1       6
> >>  0.000000e+000 0.000000e+000 0.000000e+000
> >>  1.000000e+000 0.000000e+000 0.000000e+000
> >>  1.000000e+000 2.000000e+000 0.000000e+000
> >>  0.000000e+000 2.000000e+000 0.000000e+000
> >>  0.000000e+000 0.000000e+000 1.000000e+000
> >>  1.000000e+000 0.000000e+000 1.000000e+000
> >>  1.000000e+000 2.000000e+000 1.000000e+000
> >>  0.000000e+000 2.000000e+000 1.000000e+000
> >>        4       3       2       18446744073709551
> >> 615
> >>        5       6       7       18446744073709551
> >> 608
> >>        1       5       8       18446744073709551
> >> 612
> >>        4       8       7       18446744073709551
> >> 613
> >>        3       7       6       18446744073709551
> >> 614
> >>        2       6       5       18446744073709551
> >> 615
> >>
> >>
> >> There is something wrong with the four column data. When you sign -1 to
> a
> >> unsigned long number, you will get this large number on win64.
> >>
> >> Also there are some integer type inconsistencies looks fishy:
> >>    http://review.source.kitware.com/#change,3457
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> -Xiaoxiao
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------
> >> Xiaoxiao Liu, Ph.D.
> >> R & D Engineer
> >> Kitware Inc.
> >> Clifton Park, NY
> >> Phone: (518) 881-4924  or  (518) 371-3971 x124
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _____________________________________
> > Powered by www.kitware.com
> >
> > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> >
> > Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> > http://www.kitware.com/products/protraining.html
> >
> > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> > http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
> >
> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> > http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/pipermail/insight-users/attachments/20111208/24bd5c60/attachment.htm>