[Insight-users] ITK / SimpleITK - too many erros using Windows 64 and Visual C++ 10

[DougNS]

Folks,

I am trying to compile ITK for 2 weeks without success. I tried everything
and not sure what is the error. Everytime is a differnt thing and I might be
missing something.

I tried ITK and wrap with Python and TCL. Installed TCL and Python packages
but had issues with wrapping. Many packages to be installed and the download
is not sefl sufficient (?)
 
After that I am try to compile SimpleITk to see it make simple and have an
errors with Wrap and discover that everytime a package is missing. Maybe
Windows 7 + VSC c++ is not a plataform o choice and those problems are
common. ( probaly!)

I stop using python with wrap ( I was using CWIG with version itk 3.2 and
python) and moved to for ITK 4.0. SimpleITK and last version of SWIG).

Gave up python because ot the amount of errors and lack of visibility of the
root cause. (ez_setup issues and distributuion package on for 32 not 64).. 

Started with Java but same problem. The classes cannot be compiled even if
the Java SDK is installed and working perfrectlyl.  Not sure if FTTW is
required. IF not sounds like classes will not be compiled (not clear
anywhere if the lib requires this to work). User list is sayinig I miss NSIS
(where this came from ? Only a make error note indicate that this thing was
required. ).

Everything I try there is a error and can't find documentation for that and
a reason for error.

My objective is to use java or even python for modeling and then write in
the code in C++. Can mention the errors I have been thrugouh  . Too many and
too many combination. 

I would like to know if you guys have a place where a procedure to compile
the library is available and includes everything that is needed (what
software) and covers the configurations required and sub processes to have
installed and parameter actives. 
My plataform of choise is Windows 7 64, VSC C++ 10     and Java or python
for modeling. ( not sure if FFTW will be required and dont knwo if I need
for ITK to work).

thanks a lot for any help and sorry to sound too lost. I see the the amount
of work and extraordinary effort here. But can reconcile the use this
powerfull tool as an started and by experience of using other tools. 

regards. Doug
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/ITK---SimpleITK---too-many-erros-using-Windows-64-and-Visual-C%2B%2B-10-tp32746106p32746106.html
Sent from the ITK - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.