[Insight-users] SimpleITK cannot build

Tue Nov 6 01:04:22 EST 2012

Heyy,

Thanks for the help. I started with the binaries for now. And after some
pottering around I believe I might be able to save the native ITK code as
dll and then use that in C#.

Cheers :)
Lisa

On 4 November 2012 22:33, Bradley Lowekamp <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov> wrote:

> Hello Lisa,
>
> Building SimpleITK with the superbuild ( it just build the required SWIG
> and ITK versions along with SimpleITK ), is described in the getting
> started [1] section linked from the faq. If there are parts that are
> unclear or need further explanation please let us know that that is can be
> improved.
>
> However, it sounds like getting the binaries is where you should go to get
> started.
>
> [1]http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_Release_4/SimpleITK/GettingStarted
>
> Brad
>
> On Nov 4, 2012, at 11:58 AM, Lisa Dean <lisadean.leo at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for replying Dan,Brad.
>
> *CMake version is 2.8.10 *
> *SimpleITK version is 0.5.1*
> *ITK version is 4.2.1*
> *The compiler I'm using is Visual Studio 2012 Express for Windows Desktop.
> *
>
> No, as a matter of fact I hadn't tried the binary version. I've decided to
> try that now.
>
> Are you required to use C# for your GUI? If not, you may consider using
> either native ITK or SimpleITK with any number of graphical user
> frameworks, like QT for instance.
> I could go with C# or C++ but so far in my experience C# seems to be
> easier of the two to build GUIs with, which is why I was fixated on it.
>
> Besides, SimpleITK, the only other option is to encapsulate native ITK
> (C++) in a DLL and use the P/Invoke functionality to access from a .NET application.
> This is actually my preferred method, as I am comfortable using native
> ITK and C++, and it gives me maximum flexibility. SimpleITK is much
> easier but less flexible.
> I'm no hardcore programmer and for all I understood from that it could
> have been Greek or Latin. I've absolutely no idea how to go about doing
> that unless I were to get explicit instructions directing every step. Like
> I said before the only reason I decided to go along with C# is because I
> definitely need a UI and C# is easier for that but I'm more comfortable
> with C++ and if there's a way.......
>
> I'm not sure I know what a SuperBuild is either.
>
>
> Thanks a lot once a again :)
>
> Lisa
>
>
>
>
>
> On 4 November 2012 17:08, Dan Mueller <dan.muel at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Lisa,
>>
>> Please see my responses inline below.
>>
>> On 4 November 2012 04:29, Lisa Dean <lisadean.leo at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi ITK users out there,
>> >
>> > I love ITK's functionality and I'd also like to use GUIs in this
>> specific project that I'm working on. I checked around on the ITK related
>> sites and all I could come up with was that if I want to link ITK with C# I
>> better try out Simple ITK so here I am.
>>
>> If you want to use ITK from a .NET application, then yes, SimpleITK is
>> one of the options.
>>
>> Are you required to use C# for your GUI? If not, you may consider
>> using either native ITK or SimpleITK with any number of graphical user
>> frameworks, like QT for instance.
>>
>> > I'm assuming Simple ITK provides C# wrapping for ITK filters possibly
>> not all of them but that is the essence. Is there something else I can use
>> or is SimpleITK it?
>>
>> A previous project -- ManagedITK -- is not longer supported. Besides
>> SimpleITK, the only other option is to encapsulate native ITK (C++) in
>> a DLL and use the P/Invoke functionality to access from a .NET
>> application. This is actually my preferred method, as I am comfortable
>> using native ITK and C++, and it gives me maximum flexibility.
>> SimpleITK is much easier but less flexible.
>>
>> > Also while trying to build the binaries for SimpleITK I blundered
>> across the following errors. Usually I manage to get around these but for
>> some reason (I guess my brain has been refusing to work) I've been stuck
>> with these errors for 2 days. They are probably just 2 minutes work for
>> somebody out there so could you help me out please? I'm pasting the error
>> report -
>>
>> Hmmm. I have never encountered this error. What version of
>> ITK/SimpleITK are you trying to build? What OS/compiler versions? Are
>> you using the SuperBuild option? (SuperBuild is highly recommended).
>>
>> The automated build on Win 7 using Visual Studio 9 for the latest
>> release (0.5.1) builds successfully:
>>     http://open.cdash.org/viewTest.php?onlypassed&buildid=2642787
>>
>> BTW: you can download pre-built SimpleITK .NET dlls from here:
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/simpleitk/files/SimpleITK/0.5.1/CSharp/
>>
>> > Found the following C# .NET versions: v4.0.30319, v3.5, v2.0.50727
>> >
>> > Processing json files...
>> >
>> > Processing json files...done
>> >
>> > Found the following C# .NET versions: v4.0.30319, v3.5, v2.0.50727
>> >
>> > Using .NET compiler version v2.0.50727
>> >
>> > CMake Error at CMake/UseCSharp.cmake:88 (list):
>> >
>> > list sub-command SORT only takes one argument.
>> >
>> > Call Stack (most recent call first):
>> >
>> > CMake/UseCSharp.cmake:42 (CSHARP_ADD_PROJECT)
>> >
>> > Wrapping/CMakeLists.txt:286 (csharp_add_library)
>> >
>> > CMake Error at Wrapping/CMakeLists.txt:290 (add_dependencies):
>> >
>> > add_dependencies Adding dependency to non-existent target:
>> >
>> > SimpleITKCSharpManaged
>> >
>> > CMake Error at CMake/UseCSharp.cmake:88 (list):
>> >
>> > list sub-command SORT only takes one argument.
>> >
>> > Call Stack (most recent call first):
>> >
>> > CMake/UseCSharp.cmake:46 (CSHARP_ADD_PROJECT)
>> >
>> > Testing/Unit/CMakeLists.txt:338 (csharp_add_executable)
>> >
>> > Testing/Unit/CMakeLists.txt:372 (add_csharp_test)
>> >
>> > Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Another tiny little problem that I'd like to have out of the way too.
>> I've been using ITK for some time now. But, only very recently did I decide
>> to port to ITKv4. My question is - Is OpenCl a necessity for itkv4?
>>
>> AFAIK OpenCL is not required for ITKV4. It is only used if you enable
>> the GPU option.
>>
>> HTH
>>
>> Cheers, Dan
>>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/pipermail/insight-users/attachments/20121106/38916c41/attachment.htm>