[ITK-users] [ITK-dev] [ANN] ITK 4.9 Release Candidate 1 is ready for testing!

[Simon Alexander]

No problem - only the template expansion one is worrying me about the
compiler; I'm going to follow that up with the VS team as soon as I can
generate as simpler example

On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 at 16:45 Dženan Zukić <dzenanz at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Simon for getting to this.
>
> All changes look simple enough. You maybe needed to amend previous commits
> on the same topic to generate just one review.
>
> Regards,
> Dženan
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Simon Alexander <skalexander at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I've sent a patch set to gerrit, managed to screw it up somehow and
>> generated 4 reviews instead of 1, whups.  Matt, you're on them not sure who
>> else should be.
>>
>> One of them is just a script modification so that my bash port likes your
>> utilities script, just a proposal.
>>
>> The other three address each error.  Two are a loop fusion issue where
>> mixed type comparison is being generated incorrectly, changing the bound
>> type fixes this.
>>
>> More concerning: the third change is an expansion issue with itk::Size<3>
>>  where it doesn't get the bound right for a .Fill call and never
>> initializes the last element.
>>
>> Apologies  for the delay, i'm hesitant to blame things on the compiler
>> until I've convinced myself I know what is going on.  TODO generate
>> simplified versions to file with VS team.
>>
>> cheers,
>> Simon
>>
>> On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 at 13:53 Simon Alexander <skalexander at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Matt,
>>>
>>> Quick update:  I've found two compiler bugs so far - not great.   On
>>> hopefully better news, I've also found that update 1 has shipped.  So I
>>> will configure that and run it against your RC2 to see if these things are
>>> resolved.  If not I have workarounds, unsure of the wisdom of adding them.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 at 17:34 Matt McCormick <matt.mccormick at kitware.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Simon.
>>>>
>>>> Apologies I haven't been able to put much time into this, ran into some
>>>>> interesting challenges with VS2015 itself (at least in my configuration)
>>>>> hanging permanently when changing from debug to release mode, or vice
>>>>> versa.  It seems the generated project files are a bit of a challenge for
>>>>> it.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, Visual Studio has difficulty with large projects that have many
>>>> build targets. With the 4.9 release, we addressed the behavior a bit by
>>>> reducing the number of header tests and by turning BUILD_EXAMPLES OFF by
>>>> default.
>>>>
>>>> By setting ITK_BUILD_DEFAULT_MODULES to OFF, responsiveness can be
>>>> improved when focusing on development of a subset of modules.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> At any rate, I have narrowed down part of the issue at least to being
>>>>> not in the interpolate filter itself, but rather in the test driver code
>>>>> ... somewhere in the nested loops incrementing the underlying array
>>>>> elements is behaving incorrectly in release mode.  I'll try and have  a
>>>>> closer look this weekend.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Thanks for taking a look at this!
>>>>
>>>> In the past, we ran into some issues with Visual Studio in Release mode
>>>> where adding const or using a reference for the returned type avoided a
>>>> faulty optimization. Bug reports to upstream Visual Studio have also helped
>>>> resolve the issue in some cases, too.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Matt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-users/attachments/20151208/401d9e35/attachment.html>