[ITK-users] itk::Command dtor non-virtual on purpose?

[David Cole]

But it is virtual, by virtue of inheriting such status from its base class:

http://www.itk.org/Doxygen48/html/itkLightObject_8h_source.html


HTH,
David C.


On Friday, September 4, 2015, Vaaksiainen <vaaksiainen at gmail.com> wrote:

> Retyping the header: is the itk::Command destructor non-virtual on purpose?
>
> http://www.itk.org/Doxygen48/html/itkCommand_8h_source.html
>
> 64 protected:
> 65  Command();
> 66  ~Command();
>
> The way I used its derivatives, don't see any reason for such.
>
>
> Best regards,
> -Vaaksiainen
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-users/attachments/20150904/14756b35/attachment.html>