[Insight-developers] itk::Index (signed / unsigned) long

[Will Schroeder]

Hi Luis-

I vote with Luis: unsigned long.

Will

At 10:52 AM 8/28/00 -0400, Luis Ibanez wrote:

>Hi,
>
>There are some places where the content of the
>itk::Index class is considered to be "long" and
>others where it is "unsigned long".
>
>Are we expecting to use negative indices for some application ?
>(ie. for region filters when they fall outside the support of 
>the image...)
>
>or may be we can use "unsigned long" 
>consistently through in all the code.
>
>
>(I'll vote for an uniform "unsigned long")