[Insight-developers] level set question: inside/outside
Carl-Fredrik Westin
westin@bwh.harvard.edu
Fri, 14 Feb 2003 11:52:32 -0500
Hi,
I am using positive-outside, (so are Karl Krissian, Liana Lorigo, Mike Leventon)
No strong preference though since both ways are fine.
C-F
Joshua Cates wrote:
> Hi Lydia,
>
> We should probably adopt a convention. I used the positive-inside
> convention only because that is what folks around me are using. But now
> I'm discovering the positive-outside convention is probably more what
> others are accustomed to. I wouldn't be able to do it any time soon, but
> I can change my code to produce positive-outside. I don't have a strong
> preference either way.
>
> Josh.
>
> ______________________________
> Josh Cates
> School of Computer Science
> University of Utah
> Email: cates@sci.utah.edu
> Phone: (801) 587-7697
> URL: http://www.sci.utah.edu/~cates
>
>
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Lydia Ng wrote:
>
>
>>Dear Level Set People,
>> When using level sets for segmentation I have been (maybe naively)
>>using negative-inside/ positive-outside representation. The ITK level
>>set framework uses the opposite positive-inside/negative-outside
>>representation. Is there a standard convention? Should we adopt a
>>convention for ITK? Should we support both?
>> - Lydia
--
Dr. Carl-Fredrik Westin
Director, Laboratory of Mathematics in Imaging (LMI)
Assistant Professor of Radiology, Harvard Medical School
Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115
Phone: (+1) 617-278-0639, Fax: (+1) 617-264-6887
Email: westin@bwh.harvard.edu, Office: Thorn Building 323
http://www.spl.harvard.edu/~westin