[Insight-developers] CMake Flag to make itk::Image behave like itk::OrientedImage

Bill Lorensen bill.lorensen at gmail.com
Sun Sep 14 12:52:51 EDT 2008


Luis,

They may all boil down to a few issues. For example, the OrientedImage
constructor set two matrices to Identity. This is not done in Image.
I'm fixing that now.

Bill

On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Hans,
>
> As we agreed during the ITK Tcon 2.0 on Friday:
>
>     http://www.itk.org/Wiki/Minutes_091208
>
> a CMake flag has now been added to the top CMakeLists.txt
> file with the purpose of optionally changing the itk::Image
> to behave like the itk::OrientedImage.
>
> You can now turn this option on by going to the CMake Advanced
> flags and changing:
>
>
>        ITK_IMAGE_BEHAVES_AS_ORIENTED_IMAGE
>
> The code from
>
>
>   SetSpacing
>   SetDirection
>   TransformPhysicalPointToIndex
>   TransformIndexToPhysicalPoint
>   TransformPhysicalPointToContinuousIndex
>   TransformContinuousIndexToPhysicalPoint
>
>
> was copied from the itk::OrientedImage into the itk::Image.
>
> The new code is only used if the ITK_IMAGE_BEHAVES_AS_ORIENTED_IMAGE
> flag is ON.
>
> Once the dust settles we can prevent the code duplication by moving
> this into specific methods that the itk::OrientedImage can inherit
> from the itk::Image.
>
> After fixing code in a couple of places, this complies with the flag
> ON (at least under Linux with Gcc 4.1).
>
> However, as you predicted, a large number of test fail when the flag
> is ON. An Experimental build with the flag ON was submitted yesterday
> from zion. You will find the failing tests of this build at:
>
> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewTest.php?onlyfailed&buildid=171151
>
> There are 106 failing tests.
> They broadly fall in the following categories:
>
>  1) ImageIO
>     - Analyze
>     - Nrrd
>
>  2) Mathematical Morphology
>
>  3) Image Registration
>     - normal framework and
>     - deformable registration
>
>  4) Resampling
>
>
> My suggestion is to split these groups among several developers.
>
> I'll be happy to look at the Image registration problems.
>
> Hopefully, as Ken pointed out, after fixing a couple of them
> we will find a pattern to follow.
>
>
>  Please let us know if this makes sense,
>
>
>      Thanks
>
>
>        Luis
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Insight-developers mailing list
> Insight-developers at itk.org
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>


More information about the Insight-developers mailing list