[Insight-developers] [slicer-devel] ITK 3 tag to use with slicer? Fwd: Slicer release schedule

Andras Lasso lasso at cs.queensu.ca
Sun Jul 17 08:46:42 EDT 2011


Hi Bill,

This one would also quite important (necessary for slice-to-volume
registration Slicer): http://www.itk.org/Bug/view.php?id=11699. You merged
the fix into ITK4 in January (http://review.source.kitware.com/#change,729)
but it's not in ITK-3.20.

Andras

-----Original Message-----
From: slicer-devel-bounces at bwh.harvard.edu
[mailto:slicer-devel-bounces at bwh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Bill Lorensen
Sent: 2011-July-16 5:01 PM
To: Johnson, Hans J
Cc: Slicer Development; ITK
Subject: Re: [slicer-devel] [Insight-developers] ITK 3 tag to use with
slicer? Fwd: Slicer release schedule

Steve (and all),

Are there other [atches to the Slicer ITK 3.20 clone that we should
also look at for inclusion in the official 3.20 branch?

Bill

On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Johnson, Hans J <hans-johnson at uiowa.edu>
wrote:
> I already have the patches.  It's only 3 lines of code. I was going to
> work on it tomorrow and post to gerrit.
>
> I'm currently trying to find a gcc 4.6 system to test with.
>
>
> Hans
>
>
> On 7/16/11 3:44 PM, "Bill Lorensen" <bill.lorensen at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>JC,
>>
>>If you provide a git patchs we can apply it to the itk 3.20 release.
>>
>>Using:
>>git format-patch -M
>>
>>Bill
>>
>>On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin
>><jchris.fillionr at kitware.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Folks,
>>>
>>> Looking at the history of Slicer/ITK branch "slicer-4.0", you will
>>>notice
>>> that commits have integrated so that it compiles:
>>>
>>>   1) on 64bits windows
>>>
>>> Merge branch 'fix-vnl-64bits-compile' into slicer-4.0
>>>
>>> * fix-vnl-64bits-compile:
>>>   Review DETERMINE_TYPE vxl macro
>>>   Add VXL_SIZEOF_SIZE_T test
>>>   Add VXL_HAS_WIN_WCHAR_T test
>>>
>>>
>>>   Update VXL_HAS_TYPE_OF_SIZE test
>>>
>>> See
>>>
>>>https://github.com/Slicer/ITK/commit/71e4277a785ae0f14c5c1cd2a8df1a70d99f
>>>1052
>>>
>>>   2) on unix-like system using gcc-4.6
>>>
>>> Merge branch 'fix-gcc46-compile' into slicer-4.0
>>>
>>> * fix-gcc46-compile:
>>>   COMP: Add missing include <stddef.h> for ptrdiff_t
>>>   COMP: Add missing include <stddef.h> for ptrdiff_t
>>>
>>> See
>>>
>>>https://github.com/Slicer/ITK/commit/309a4221146ee34ee87cd4a3fc0cae26bd75
>>>35c4
>>>
>>>
>>> It shouldn't be to hard to patch the version of ITK your are currently
>>>using
>>> for Slicer3.
>>>
>>> Any question, please let me know.
>>> Thanks
>>> Jc
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Stephen Aylward
>>> <stephen.aylward at kitware.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Steve,
>>>>
>>>> I am CC'ing J2 and JC.
>>>>
>>>> JC, in particular, did a huge amount of work to get ITK-Slicer to
>>>> compile for 64bits.  We should not change versions without involving
>>>> him.
>>>>
>>>> s
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Steve Pieper <pieper at ibility.net>
>>>>wrote:
>>>> > Hi Hans, Bill, Stephen Luis -
>>>> >
>>>> > Is there a version of ITK 3 that compiles on the gcc-4.6 compiler?
>>>>I'm
>>>> > not
>>>> > on the itk-devel list so I can't follow the link in Dominique's
>>>>email,
>>>> > but I
>>>> > guess there's been some discussion of it.  (Bill - this is the
>>>>question
>>>> > I
>>>> > mentioned the other day on the phone).
>>>> >
>>>> > What I'm looking for is a version of ITK to make the default for the
>>>> > current
>>>> > slicer3 trunk so that it will build on the latest compilers.  Also
>>>>we'll
>>>> > want to use that version for slicer4 currently, with the ideas that
>>>> > we'll
>>>> > eventually want to swap over to ITK 4.x when it settles down.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> > Steve
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> > From: Dominique Belhachemi <domibel at debian.org>
>>>> > Date: Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:31 AM
>>>> > Subject: Re: Slicer release schedule
>>>> > To: pieper at bwh.harvard.edu
>>>> > Cc: Ron Kikinis <kikinis at bwh.harvard.edu>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Hi Steve,
>>>> >
>>>> > I asked in May if they can do a new patch release. They patched their
>>>> > git release branch and I am waiting now...
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>http://www.itk.org/mailman/private/insight-developers/2011-May/018475.ht
>>>>ml
>>>> >
>>>> > BTW, This doesn't affect the Debian packages, it only affects people
>>>> > who compile Slicer3 from scratch on a Linux box with the current
>>>> > gcc-4.6 compiler.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks
>>>> > Dominique
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Steve Pieper <pieper at ibility.net>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Dominique Belhachemi
>>>> >> <domibel at debian.org>
>>>> >>> ITK looks good. There are basically no changes to ITK 3.x. But for
>>>>the
>>>> >>> current Slicer3 release you have to ask for a new tag. Otherwise
>>>>user
>>>> >>> will run into gcc-4.6 compilation issues.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> For packaging we should be able to use the 3.20 release (I don't
>>>>recall
>>>> >> the
>>>> >> version issues - does 3.20 build on gcc 4.6?).  Or if that's the one
>>>> >> that
>>>> >> fails we can probably twist their arms to make a 3.22 version with
>>>>the
>>>> >> fix
>>>> >> for everyone.
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> ==============================
>>>> Stephen R. Aylward, Ph.D.
>>>> Director of Medical Imaging Research
>>>> Kitware, Inc. - North Carolina Office
>>>> http://www.kitware.com
>>>> stephen.aylward (Skype)
>>>> (919) 969-6990 x300
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> +1 919 869 8849
>>>
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>>Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>>Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>>http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>>
>>Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>>http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>
>>Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by
the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is
confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
 Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error,
then delete it.  Thank you.
> ________________________________
>
_______________________________________________
slicer-devel mailing list
slicer-devel at bwh.harvard.edu
http://massmail.spl.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/slicer-devel
To unsubscribe: send email to slicer-devel-request at massmail.spl.harvard.edu
with unsubscribe as the subject




More information about the Insight-developers mailing list