[Insight-developers] CSI-ITK: HDF5 intermittent failures

Williams, Norman K norman-k-williams at uiowa.edu
Wed Jun 8 09:44:32 EDT 2011


There are a lot of builds that fail, and they all (save one) have
something in common.  The test writes a file, but then cannot read it --
either it fails to open or it fails to read the first dataset.


I verified that the tests do in fact close the file they've created.

I also notice that for many systems that fail, very similar systems
succeed.

I can add a test that attempts to read a known-good image, and see if that
fails as well.

I've been loading up VMs in virtual boxes that are, where possible1 as
close as possible to the failing systems.  So far no failures.

As I've said before, if someone can give me an account on any of the
machines with failures I'll gladly investigate.

On 6/8/11 6:47 AM, "Brad King" <brad.king at kitware.com> wrote:

>On 06/07/2011 10:51 AM, Brad King wrote:
>> On 06/04/2011 12:02 PM, Bill Lorensen wrote:
>>> Looks like an uninitialized variable somewhere? valgrind does not
>>> catch them all... Maybe you should run cppcheck on the HDF5 thirdparty
>>> code.
>>
>> At Kent's request I've updated the HDF5 snapshot to version 1.8.7 from
>> upstream.  I manually built and tested it on Linux with GCC and Windows
>> with MinGW and VS 9 tools.  We should all keep an eye out for new
>> warnings.
>>
>> The commit range of the changes is "e1f9e848..b76ce0bd".
>
>Well, there are quite a few places that the HDF5 tests now fail:
>
>http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testSummary.php?project=2&name=itkHDF5ImageIOTe
>st&date=2011-06-07
>http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testSummary.php?project=2&name=itkHDF5ImageIOSt
>reamingReadWriteTest&date=2011-06-07
>
>However, they pass on all the Kitware machines and on all my own builds
>(except itkHDF5ImageIOTest on factory.kitware fails for an unrelated
> reason).
>
>Can anyone with a machine where it fails investigate, please?
>
>Thanks,
>-Brad



________________________________
Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error, then delete it.  Thank you.
________________________________


More information about the Insight-developers mailing list