[Insight-developers] nrrd assumptions and signed overflow

[Sean McBride]

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:39:15 +0000, Williams, Norman K said:

>Well, I guess that means CLang agrees with me that the NRRD code is just
>plain wrong.
>
>I'd vote for a patch to NRRD in ITK that removes the code that
>intentionally overflows.

I've also posted on the teem list as David suggested and they are working on fixing it upstream.

I'll try commenting out the intentional overflows and see if this fixes the bulk of the test failures...

Cheers,

-- 
____________________________________________________________
Sean McBride, B. Eng                 sean at rogue-research.com
Rogue Research                        www.rogue-research.com 
Mac Software Developer              Montréal, Québec, Canada