[Insight-users] Re: [Insight-developers] Neighborhood iterator refactoring request for comment

Luis Ibanez luis.ibanez@kitware.com
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 21:50:45 -0500


Hi Josh,

This looks great.


Some comments:

(1) Will help to reduce the learning curve for
     using the neighborhood iterator.

(2b) will be quite useful to access neighbors by their offset.

(2c) question: will this distance take spacing into account ?
      maybe we need two of this methods, one measuring in pixels
      and another in space coordinates.


(3a,3b) again are useful additions.

(3c) maybe to know if it is inside the requested region.. ?
      altough by having the index from (3a) we could query
      the region directly....


(5) Is a powerful addition. Arbitrary shaped neighborhoods
     allow more flexibility in algorithm implementation.
     This will make possible to manage different connectivities.

(5b,5c) I'm not sure about throwing exceptions at the iterator level...
      What could be an scenario for attempting access to an invalid
      location ? maybe when access is made using indices and/or offset ?

(5f) Will be really cool to have. We could implement evolving cellular
      automata with this. Things like region growing algorithms whose
      growth rules depend on the image context. It could also be possible
      to emulate cellular colonies using a neighborhood iterator per
      cell. Cell growth could be simulated by inserting neighbors.
      Also algorithms like curvature flow can be qualitatively
      simulated by cellular automata using simple rules like just
      "voting".

(5g) How about computing collisions between two different neighborhood
      iterators. Something like checking if one index is contained in
      the neighborhood of both iterators. This will facilitate to throw
      N (maybe>1000) neigborhood iterators over an image and make them
      grow and reproduce in order to segment images. It will look a bit
      like the Voronoi2D segmentation but without the restriction to 2D.

      For example an iterator could grow its neighborhood if the
      pixels on the boundary satisfy a certain condition (e.g. like
      the ConfidenceConnectedness filter). A neighborhood iterators could
      split in two if it reaches a maximum size or if the pixels
      internally become too diverse. In some way, the FloodFill iterator
      will be the limit case of a growing neighborhood iterator.

      So far neighborhood iterators have been used with a single instance
      visiting the whole image following a static pattern. Facilitating
      their use in aggregates could be quite powerful.





    Luis



=============================

Joshua Cates wrote:

> Hi Folks,
> 
> I am refactoring the neighborhood iterators to optimize them with respect
> to current use and expected future use.  I expect to change their
> implementation slightly (mostly transparent to the user), but also I want
> to add some new functionality.
> 
> Below is a summary of the functionality that both exists in the iterators
> and that I think would be nice to have based on how I've used the
> iterators and how I've seen others use them.
> 
> Items which are new or represent changes are marked with +.
> 
> 
> itk neighborhood iterators
> 
> (1)+ A single iterator class handles forward, backward, and random access,
> and automatically enables/disables bounds checking at construction time 
> by analyzing its iteration region.  This is different from original 
> design where increasing functionality was added through subclassing.
> 
> (2) The API supports access of neighbor pixel values through
>     (a) A scalar index into a linear array.  it.GetPixel(14)
>    +(b) An itk::Offset from the center index.  
>         it.GetPixel(itk::Offset<3>(1,0,0))
>    +(c) A distance and direction along a principle axis. it.GetNext(0, 1)
>     (d) Returning/setting entire neighborhood at once. it.GetNeighborhood()
> 
> (3) The API supports querying the following information about a neighbor 
> pixel.
>    +(a) Its image index (itk::Index) location.  
>         it.GetIndex(14), it.GetIndex(itk::Offset<3>(1,0,0), etc.
>    +(b) Its offset (itk::Offset) from the center of the neighborhood. 
>         it.GetOffset(14), etc.
>    +(c) What else do people need to know? Perhaps spatial distance from the
>         center pixel?
> 
> (4) The API supports querying the following information about the 
> neighborhood
>     (a) Stride lengths along each neighborhood axis.  GetStride(1).
>     (b) Extent of the neighborhood (radius)
>     (c) Slices (std::slice) along axes.  GetSlice(2)
>     (d) Size of the underlying neighborhood container, i.e. how many 
>         pixels are the neighborhood.
>     (e) Image location (itk::Index) of the center of the neighborhood.
> 
> (5)+ A new iterator class extends (1) to allow the creation of arbitrarily
>      shaped iterators. Shaped neighborhood iterators have the following
>      properties.
>    (a) Iterators are optimized for linear array access, versus indexed
>        lookups, though both should be possible.  This means I expect more use
>        for things like neighborhood searching, summation of values, etc.
>    (b) Respond to all access methods in (2).  Attempted access 
>        of undefined pixel locations throws an exception.
>    (c) Respond to all queries in (3). Querying on an undefined neighbor
>        throws an exception.
>    (d) Responds to a restricted subset of (4). GetSlice and GetStride  don't
>        make sense in this context, for example.
>    (e) Active or inactive neighbor locations are specified by offsets from  the
>        center of the neighborhood.
>    (f) Neighbor locations can be activated or deactivated after construction
>        to support reshaping the neighborhood on-the-fly?
>    (g) What else?
> 
> Attached below are some use case scenarios I put together which exercise
> some of the existing and proposed API. Please send me your additional use
> cases.
> 
> I welcome comments from anyone.  I plan to start working on these changes
> next week.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Josh.
>  
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> typedef itk::Image<float, 3> ImageType;
> ImageType::Pointer image;
>   
>   .
>   .
>   .
> 
> //
> // In a 3x3 neighborhood mask, create a shaped neighborhood
> //
> ShapedNeighborhoodIterator<ImageType>::RadiusType radius = {1, 1, 1};
> ShapedNeighborhoodIterator<ImageType> it(radius, image, 
> image->GetRequestedRegion);
> 
> //
> // activate the center cell
> //
> it->ActivateIndex(itk::Offset<3>(0,0,0));
> 
> //
> // activate a list of cells which represent the 6-neighbors
> //
> std::list<itk::Offset<3> > active_cells;
> active_cells.push_back(itk::Offset<3>(0,-1,0));
> active_cells.push_back(itk::Offset<3>(0,1,0));
> active_cells.push_back(itk::Offset<3>(-1,0,0));
> active_cells.push_back(itk::Offset<3>(1,0,0));
> active_cells.push_back(itk::Offset<3>(0,0,1));
> active_cells.push_back(itk::Offset<3>(0,0,-1));
> 
> it->ActivateIndex(active_cells);
> 
> 
> //
> // Calculate all z partial derivatives using a non-shaped neighborhood
> // 
> itk::ConstNeighborhoodIterator<ImageType> it(region, image, 
> image->GetRequestedRegion());
> itk::NeighborhoodInnerProduct<ImageType> IP;
> itk::DerivativeOperator<3> d_op;
> d_op->SetOrder(1);
> d_op->SetDirection(2);
> d_op->CreateDirectional();
> d_op->FlipAxes();
> 
> std::slice z_slice = it.GetSlice(2);
> for (; !it.IsAtEnd(); ++it) { float df_dz = IP(z_slice, it, d_op); }
> 
> 
> // 
> // Calculate "half" forward derivatives in y direction
> //
> for (it.GoToBegin(); !it.IsAtEnd(); ++it) { float dy_forward = 
> it.GetNext(2) - it.GetCenter(); }
> 
> 
> //
> // Sum pixel values in neighborhoods
> //
> for (it.GoToBegin(); !it.IsAtEnd(); ++it)
> {
>   float sum = 0.0f;
>   for (unsigned i = 0; i < it.Size(); ++i) { sum += it.GetPixel(i); }
> }
> 
> // 
> // Search the neighborhood for a value and and find the itk::Offset of that 
> // neighbor from the center of the neighborhood.  here used to implement a 
> // "flood fill" type iterator.  Can use shaped or non-shaped iterator. 
> // 
> std::list<itk::Index<3> > indicies_to_visit;
> indicies_to_visit.push_back( itk::Index<3>(x_seed,y_seed,z_seed) ); 
> 
> while (! indicies_to_visit.empty() ) 
> {
>   itk::Index idx = indicies_to_visit.front()
>   indicies_to_visit.pop_front();
>   this->do_some_stuff(idx);
>   
>   it.SetLocation(idx); // or perhaps: it+=(idx - it.GetIndex());
>   for (unsigned i =0; i < it.Size(); ++i)   
>     {
>       if ( it.GetPixel(i) == it.GetCenterPixel() )
>         {
>           if (this->already_visited( it.GetIndex(i) ) == false)
>             indicies_to_visit.push_back( it.GetIndex(i) );
>         }
>     }
> }
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________
>  Josh Cates			
>  School of Computer Science	
>  University of Utah
>  Email: cates@sci.utah.edu
>  Phone: (801) 587-7697
>  URL:   www.cs.utk.edu/~cates
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Insight-developers mailing list
> Insight-developers@public.kitware.com
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
> 
>