[Insight-users] MR volume: slice location + spacing pb

[Stephen R. Aylward]

Sounds like a plan - kind of the only option with that data.

I'd really encourage your clinical folks to try a 3D sequence with 
contiguous slices...might be too large of a volume...

s

Dean Inglis wrote:
> Well, on closer inspection, for the data I have,
> I am getting slice thicknesses of either 1.5 or 3.0 mm
> thickness as calculated from the reported (correct) slice positions.
> So, ignoring the header thickness is the way to go. I am
> thinking of just linear interpolating (with vtkImageResample) 
> an additional slice between any two slices that are 3.0 mm 
> thick so that a new volume can be recon at 1.5 mm thick 
> consistent between slices.  Does this seem resonable?  BTW, 
> I'm looking at fat sat saggital knee MRIs for cartilage
> segmentation.
> 
> thanks again,
> Dean
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Insight-users mailing list
> Insight-users at public . kitware . com
> http://public . kitware . com/mailman/listinfo/insight-users


-- 
===========================================================
Dr. Stephen R. Aylward
Associate Professor of Radiology
Adjunct Associate Professor of Computer Science and Surgery
http://caddlab . rad . unc . edu
aylward at unc . edu
(919) 966-9695