[Insight-users] Re: Journal submission gone wrong - probably

[Richard Beare]

Hi Everyone,

I was confused about where the additional files are submitted, so I
thought they must get unpacked later on. I'll try a revision in which
I the article first and then add the archive afterwards. I'll do this
when I'm back at work next week.

Talk to you then if there are any problems.

On 12/23/05, Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Gaetan,
>
>
> 1) We checked the submission of Richard's paper,
>     it seems that there was a network connection problem
>     between the testing server at Kitware and the DSpace
>     server at UNC. Zack rerun the test and the dashboard
>     evaluation is now posted in the Insight Journal.
>
>
> 2) About posting the source material of the paper, it is
>     fine if you find better to put it as a subdirectory
>     of the  source code. I would prefer to have it independently
>     just because some papers may become large, specially if
>     they have images inserted, and because many users may
>     be interested in the source code more than in the source
>     text of the paper, so they would be penalized when downloading.
>
>     On the other hand, one nice thing about your suggestion,
>     is that by putting the paper source text in the same
>     directory tree as the source code, the paper can easily
>     use the same images as the source code, and in that way
>     get closer to the ideal situation where the images in the
>     paper are *exactly* the same as the ones you are using
>     for running your code. This is probably the best way of
>     having *reproducible* papers.
>
>
>     So... to summarize, please feel free to submit the
>     source text + graphics of the paper as a subdirectory
>     of the source code submission.
>
>     It is still preferable to have the PDF appart, so
>     readers can take a look at the paper before they
>     decide to invest time trying the source code.
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot for your support to the Insight Journal
> and to ITK.
>
>
>
>     Regards,
>
>
>        Luis
>
>
>
> -----------------------
> Gaetan Lehmann wrote:
> > Hi Luis,
> >
> > Thanks for your useful report :-)
> >
> > The ImageCompare path will be fixed.
> >
> > The article is in the archive. It is called Article.pdf. But you're right, it
> > should be outside the tar.gz. Because I've already done that for my previous
> > submissions, I should have advise Richard to do that.
> >
> > I think it's nice to submit the sources of the paper, and I'm glad to see you
> > also think so. However, I don't think that's useful to send the paper sources
> > in a separated archive. It's just more work and more archives. Do you really
> > find it useful ?
> >
> > About tests, I'm surprised to not see the results of the IJ dashboard. Is
> > there a problem ?
> >
> > Finally, the second author (me) appear on the review page
> > (http://insight-journal.org/view_reviews.php?back=index.php&pubid=62) but not
> > on the first page.
> >
> > Gaetan
> >
> > On Thursday 22 December 2005 16:50, Luis Ibanez wrote:
> >
> >>Hi Richard,
> >>
> >>
> >>Another detail,
> >>
> >>It seems that CMake is not searching for "ImageCompare" in the path.
> >>
> >>So you may want to add the following line to your CMakeLists.txt file
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>           FIND_PROGRAM(IMAGE_COMPARE ImageCompare)
> >>
> >>
> >>and in the TEST lines replace "ImageCompare" with "${IMAGE_COMPARE}",
> >>so the lines will look like:
> >>
> >>
> >>       ADD_TEST(VRMinFCompare ${IMAGE_COMPARE}
> >>                              cthead1-vrminF.png
> >>                              cthead1-vrminF-ref.png)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>   Regards,
> >>
> >>
> >>     Luis
> >>
> >>
> >>--------------------
> >>
> >>Richard Beare wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>I've just submitted something to the Insight Journal and suspect I've
> >>>got it totally wrong. I've uploaded the archive created from Gaetan's
> >>>template, which includes all the code, data and the article. I
> >>>anticipated that it was going to be unpacked, and the article
> >>>extracted, but it doesn't look as though this has happened, so I
> >>>suspect I've made a mistake and should have handled the submission
> >>>differently. I didn't see anywhere that would allow the upload of
> >>>multiple files.
> >>>
> >>>If I have messed up severely then let me know what I should do to fix
> >>>it. The handle is:
> >>>
> >>>http://hdl.handle.net/1926/153
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Insight-users mailing list
> >>Insight-users at itk.org
> >>http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
> >>
> >>
> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Insight-users mailing list
> >>Insight-users at itk.org
> >>http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Insight-users mailing list
> Insight-users at itk.org
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
>