[Insight-users] itk::VariableSizeMatrix

[Luis Ibanez]

Hi Julien,

Thanks for pointing this out.

Notice that, since this class doesn't derives from any other class,
we could simply add the method:


    virtual const char *GetNameOfClass() const
         {return "VariableSizeMatrix"; }

to the header.

This may be less confusing than adding a TypeMacro in a class that
doesn't have a superclass.

Could you please log this issue as a bug report in
the Mantis bug tracker ?

    http://public.kitware.com/Bug/my_view_page.php



     Thanks


        Luis


-------------------
Julien Michel wrote:
> Dear ITK users,
> 
> We are using the itk::VariableSizeMatrix class when our matrix size can 
> not be decided at compilation time.
> 
> In this class encapsulating the vnl/vnl_matrix class redefines all the 
> operators, such as += or -= for instance.
> 
> In these operators, a size check is performed in order to check the 
> matrices compatibility. Eventually, an exception is raised using the 
> itkExpectionMacro. This macro needs the GetNameOfClass method to be 
> defined.
> 
> However, the VariableSizeMatrix derives from nothing, and no 
> itkTypeMacro is used in its header, so there is no GetNameOfClass method.
> 
> This lead us to compiling errors whenever we are trying to use these 
> operators.
> 
> To fix this, I think either an itkTypeMacro should be used in the class 
> declaration or an itkGenericExceptionMacro should be used in the 
> operators checking.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Julien Michel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Insight-users mailing list
> Insight-users at itk.org
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
>