[Insight-users] OPEN ACCESS: NIH POLICY EFFECTIVE : Monday April 7 2008
Bill Lorensen
bill.lorensen at gmail.com
Wed Apr 9 13:36:42 EDT 2008
Maybe we should ask specific questions. Ask about SPIE Medical
Imaging, it is used by many NIH authors. Ask about MICCAI. Actually, I
would hope that NIH would create a list of conferences that qualify or
not qualify.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Torsten Rohlfing
<torsten at synapse.sri.com> wrote:
> Hi Luis --
>
> Frankly, I would interpret this as:
>
> "We don't know what we are talking about, but since it is *you* who has to
> comply with the policy, it's your problem, not ours, to figure it out."
>
> Basically, they have not answered the question at all, and I doubt they
> actually understood what was being asked. Not exactly encouraging, although
> I guess by continuing to refer to "journal articles" they are providing a
> very convenient loophole for authors of conference papers.
>
> I am not even going to try and raise the issue now of whether or not a
> conference article is considered peer-reviewed if the review is based on a
> shorter form of the paper (e.g., for SPIE Medical Imaging).
>
> Thanks for trying though.
> Torsten
>
>
> Luis Ibanez wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Torsten,
> >
> > We got the following answer from NIH:
> >
> > <quote>
> > Thank you for your e-mail to Public Access at the National Institutes of
> > Health (NIH).
> >
> > The Policy applies to all peer-reviewed journal articles, including
> > research reports and reviews. The Policy does not apply to
> > non-peer-reviewed materials such as correspondence, book chapters, and
> > editorials. Therefore, if the conference article is a non-peer-reviewed
> > article, then it is not subject to the public access policy.
> >
> > Regards from GrantsInfo on behalf of Public Access
> > Public Access: http://publicaccess.nih.gov/
> >
> >
> > GrantsInfo provides general information about NIH extramural medical and
> > behavioral research, research training programs,
> > and the grant application process.
> > </quote>
> >
> >
> >
> > I would interpret this as:
> >
> >
> > Articles accepted at peer-reviewed
> > conferences are subject to the policy.
> >
> >
> >
> > Please let us know if you have any other questions,
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> > Luis
> >
> >
> > ---------------------
> > Luis Ibanez wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Torsten Rohlfing, PhD SRI International, Neuroscience Program
> Research Scientist 333 Ravenswood Ave, Menlo Park, CA 94025
> Phone: ++1 (650) 859-3379 Fax: ++1 (650) 859-2743
> torsten at synapse.sri.com http://www.stanford.edu/~rohlfing/
>
> "Though this be madness, yet there is a method in't"
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Insight-users mailing list
> Insight-users at itk.org
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
>
More information about the Insight-users
mailing list